My vocabulary in math is lacking quite a lot, so please forgive me if my question is not sufficiently accurate or needlessly verbose. I tried very hard to get the latex flowing, at least that's one thing I got going.
In the syllabus from which I'm currently studying, the proof of this equation is something I have difficulty grasping (this is a quick example that's supposed to be self-explanatory *desperate face*):
$$\sum_{i=1}^{k}(2i-1) = k^2$$
Now, this is the proof in the syllabus:
$$\sum_{i=1}^{k+1}(2i-1) = \sum_{i=1}^k(2i-1) + 2k + 1$$
$$\sum_{i=1}^{k+1}(2i-1) = k^2 + 2k + 1$$
$$\sum_{i=1}^{k+1}(2i-1) = (k+1)^2$$
I understand the reasoning, 1 being the minimum value and valid allows for rewriting the equation for k+1, and if everything for the k+1 version is valid, along with the minimum of k being valid, everything is valid.
However, why isn't the first step done like this? (subtraction, isn't valid but seems logical to me atm)
$$\sum_{i=1}^k(2i-1) + 2k - 1$$
Also, could someone please point me in the right direction on how to accomplish this conversion:
$$k^2+2k+1 = (k+1)^2$$
Thank you in advance for helping me find the sources on how to understand everything until page 18 (out of 180 ^_^)