You seem to be asking at two different questions, which are reflected in the current answers.
If you want to denote an entry of the Hessian matrix (this is a second partial derivative of a function) at a particular point $p$, there are many ways to do this:
$$
\frac{\partial^2 f}{ \partial x_i \partial x_j}(p)
$$
or $$\left.\frac{\partial^2 f}{ \partial x_i \partial x_j}\right|_p$$
or $$f_{i,j} (p)$$
might all be appropriate depending on context.
If you want a way to talk about the Hessian matrix at a particular point, then using $$H(f)(p)$$ or $$H_f(p)$$ might be appropriate
If you view the Hessian as a quadratic form, then as Ivo Terek mentions, you might want apply the Hessian to a vector at a point and write
$$H_f(p,v)$$ or something similar.
In my opinion the "best" perspective on the Hessian is as a bilinear form which approximates the change in the directional derivative of $f$ in direction $v_1$ which results from moving in direction $v_2$. That is, I would write
$$H_f(p)(v_1,v_2) \approx Df_{p+v_2}(v_1)-Df_p(v_1)$$.
From this perspective, one can recover the second partials from the bilinear map as
$$\left.\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x_i \partial x_j}\right|_p = H_f(p)(e_i,e_j)$$
where $e_k$ are the standard basis vectors.
The bottom line is: decide on a notation, explain it, and use it consistently