I recently discovered logarithmic differentiation (Which was not taught to me at college for some reason) in the "Engineering Mathematics" book by Stroud. It striked me that the example and solved exercises were not fully simplified (They simply get to $f'(x)/ f(x)$ and then they multiply all of it by $f(x)$). This leaves a fairly big and (IMO) ugly product, which would probably be wrong at any test I have done (e.g. 4th edition, page 397, frame 25 exercise 4, I'm not going to copy that here because with my latex skills it would take two hours).
In some exercises, after doing whatever you need to do, you are asked to simplify the result. In others you don't. It seems to me that in this last case the decision of simplifying or not, and even the choice of making students simplify the result or not, is arbitrary. Is there any kind of rule or agreement about when to simplify something and when not? I haven't found anything so far and I find this apparent randomness very annoying.
I am wondering why sometimes textbooks and teachers simplify everything for half a page using confusing techniques that can potentially add mistakes to the result and consider the answer incorrect or not completely solved if you don't and other times they simply leave a number and symbol blob on the paper and consider it correct and perfectly valid.
Edit: A perfect example of this is the third exercise from the bottom in this page