However,
With rotation letting Q = 7y^2 -52xy -32x^2 using a rotation matrix have that:
x = cx' + sy'
y = -sx' + cy'
x^2 = c^2x'^2 +s^2y'^2 + 2csx'y'
y^2 = s^2x'^2 +c^2y'^2 - 2csx'y'
xy = -csx'^2 + csy'^2 + (c^2 - s^2)(x'y')
Subbing in these and extracting all x'y' components to equate to zero gives:
-14csx'y' -64csx'y' -52(c^2 - s^2)(x'y') = 0
x'y'(52s^2 - 78cs - 52c^2) = 0
2s^2 - 3cs -2c^2 = 0
using quadratic formula for s
s = 3/4c +or- 5/4c = -1/2c or 2c (dividing both by c) gives:
t = -1/2 or 2 hence
theta = 26.57 or 63.43
Subbing either into Q since both render xy component zero (subbing 26.57) gives:
Q' = 20y'^2 - 45x'^2
Completing the square and re-arranging gives
5((root2y' - 3(root2)/2)^2)/39 - 5((root3x' - 2(root3)/3)^2)/26 = 1
Which is a hyperbola with a^2 = 39/5 and b^2 = 26/5
We know e^2 = 1 - (b^2)/(a^2) = 1/3
Hence I find e = root(1/3)
To lab Bhatt: Barring a mistake on my part it seems that our eccentricities differ where in your assumption of X and Y e = root(65/81). What have I done wrong? Is it the perpendicular bit that allows for X and Y assumption. Please shed some light if you will. I would suggest that maybe rotation doesn't make a difference to eccentricity as you suggest but the assumption does?