1

I need to prove that $f^{-1}(f(C))=C$.

This are the informations. There exists two sets A and B, and function $f(A)\to B$.

I don't know how to solve this, and I tried to search google, but I didn't find anything useful.

Please help. Thanks!!

EDIT: I forgot to add that function is bijective

depecheSoul
  • 913
  • 7
  • 13

2 Answers2

2

Hint: Show that $f^{-1}(f(C)) \subseteq C$ and $f^{-1}(f(C)) \supseteq C$. One of these is true for any $f$, while the other relies on the fact that $f$ is bijective (in fact, you just need $f$ to be injective).

  • Because $ f^{-1}(f(x))\subset C\ and\ f^{-1}(f(x))\supset C$ is a definition of subsets equality,can I write that $f^{-1}(f(C))=f^{-1}(f(C))$ and go from there??? Thanks – depecheSoul Jan 05 '14 at 15:53
  • What is $x$ and why are the two subset relationships true? Note that $f^{-1}(f(C))$ and $C$ are two sets. To show $f^{-1}(f(C)) \subseteq C$, you need to show that every element of $f^{-1}(f(C))$ is an element of $C$. – Michael Albanese Jan 05 '14 at 15:59
  • I tried to solve it something like this: For every element $x$ from $A$ it is valid that $y=f(x)\implies x=f^{-1}(y)$, and for $x\in B$, so now I have that $f^{-1}(f(x))=f^{-1}(y)=x$, and now I have to do the same for $x\in B$. Am I on right track. Thanks for helping me!! – depecheSoul Jan 05 '14 at 16:06
  • First of all, that implication requires justification. Once you have justified it, you have shown that $f^{-1}(f(x)) = x$. Which of the two subset relationships does this help you to prove? – Michael Albanese Jan 05 '14 at 16:10
  • What do you mean by justification? – depecheSoul Jan 05 '14 at 16:20
  • I mean that you should say $y = f(x)$ implies $x = f^{-1}(y)$ because $f$ is a bijection. – Michael Albanese Jan 06 '14 at 12:32
1

Here is a somewhat bigger hint, in a different style than you may be used to.

First, which elements $\;x\;$ does the set $\;f^{-1}[f[C]]\;$ contain? Let's use the basic properties and calculate: \begin{align} & x \in f^{-1}[f[C]] \\ \equiv & \;\;\;\;\;\text{"basic property of $\;\cdot^{-1}[\cdot]\;$: $\;x \in f^{-1}[W] \;\equiv\; f(x) \in W\;$"} \\ & f(x) \in f[C] \\ \equiv & \;\;\;\;\;\text{"basic property of $\;\cdot[\cdot]\;$: $\;y \in f[V] \;\equiv\; \langle \exists x : x \in V : f(x) = y \rangle\;$"} \\ & \langle \exists z : z \in C : f(z) = f(x) \rangle \\ \text{...} & \;\;\;\;\;\text{"..."} \\ \end{align}

Now we want to end this calculation with $\;x \in C\;$ (why?), and there are two ways to continue it: \begin{align} & \langle \exists z : z \in C : f(z) = f(x) \rangle \\ \Leftarrow & \;\;\;\;\;\text{"choose a specific $\;z\;$ that gets us near our goal..."} \\ & \text{...} \\ \end{align} and also \begin{align} & \langle \exists z : z \in C : f(z) = f(x) \rangle \\ \Rightarrow & \;\;\;\;\;\text{"assume $\;f\;$ has some specific property to achieve our goal..."} \\ & \text{...} \\ \end{align}

How do you complete the calculations? What property of $\;f\;$ do you need? What is your conclusion?