
Please forgive my childish drawing, this is the quickest way I could think to express my question.
Though the truth values of an implication and its contrapositive are the same, they do not seem to give the same amount of information, as represented in my horrible little sketch by which areas of the diagram are colour defined by each relation.
Isn't this a problem in their "equivalence" if one tells you more than the other? (It seems that the contrapositive describes a smaller set on the diagram, which I am equating to more information).