0

$\displaystyle \bigcap_{i=1}^nA_i\subseteq \bigcap_{i=1}^{m+n}A_i\ $ and $m>0$

I have to describe whether or not this statement is true. From my understanding it is False, but I'm not sure if my logic is flawed.

I took an example where $m=1$ and $n=1$

$\displaystyle \bigcap_{i=1}^1A_i\subseteq \bigcap_{i=1}^{1+1}A_i\ $

$A_1 \subseteq (A_1 \cap A_2)$

So as $m$ increases the intersection would have a smaller probability of being a superset of $\displaystyle \bigcap_{i=1}^nA_i$

Trajan
  • 5,194
  • 2
  • 27
  • 71
petrov
  • 335
  • 2
  • 5
  • 12

1 Answers1

0

You are exactly right. Anyway, you should give an example of $A_1$ and $A_2$. You could take $A_1=\{\emptyset\}$, $A_2=\emptyset$.