This vector space is nice, never encountered such an example.
If you found that the zero vector is $-2$, the additive inverse is not too far away. You actually don't need to care about scalar multiplication for this part.
The problem of finding the additive inverse is to find a function $i:V\to V$ such that for every $u\in V$, you have $u\boxplus i(u)=e$, where $e$ is the zero vector of $(V,\boxplus,\boxdot)$.
So the first step is to find the zero vector, which you claim you had. Just to be sure, I show here how it is found: for all $u\in V$, we want $u\boxplus e=u$. This means for all $u\in \mathbb R$, we have $u+e+2=u$. We immediatly get $e=-2$, by choosing any $u$ (for instance it suffices to look at $u=0$).
Now we want to find the function $i$ which gives us the additive inverse of any vector of $V$.
Given $u$, we need to find $i(u)$ such that $u\boxplus i(u)=e$. This last equation translates $u+i(u)+2=-2$. we solve the equation for $i(u)$, and we get $i(u)=-4-u$, for all $u\in V$. So this shows that the additive inverse in $V$ is given by the formula $i(u)=-4-u$. Notice that for instance $i(e)=-4-(-2)=-4+2=-2=e$, which is normal: zero is always its own inverse.