34

In my class, I always write the date using mathematical formulas, or cool little equations. I want to show my students that even the most mundane seeming number often has fascinating features, and its own beauty - that's the reason I got into mathematics, and I want to pass it down.

For example, for 30, I wrote $\frac{6!}{4!}$.

Now, 2014 has kind of stumped me. The best I could come up with was this, using factorials:

$$(2!(2!+2!(4!))+3!)(4!-3!+1!)$$

But, this isn't the most attractive, or interesting, equation.

What do you think the best (nerdiest?) way to write 2014 is?

15 Answers15

101

Looking $2014$ up in the OEIS turns up:

$$2014=13^3-13^2-13^1-13^0$$

In general, looking a number up in the OEIS is probably a reasonable way to turn up pleasing identities.

Jack M
  • 27,819
  • 7
  • 63
  • 129
42

Give them the following :

$$(-2+0+1+4)^{(2+0+1+4)}-(2+0+1+4)^{(-2+0+1+4)}+(2+0-1+4)^{(-2+0+1+4)}+(2+0-1+4)\cdot(-2+0+1+4)^2=?$$

and tell them to compute the result.

All you can see is only 2014 with some sign changed and of course the result is simply
$$3^7-7^3+5^3+5\cdot3^2=2014$$
It will look better on a board.

34

With all due credit to this base 13 answer on codegolf.SE:

$$2014=BBC_{13}$$


Or just playing with my calculator, I like the look of

$$2014=5^5-1111$$

21

I hope you will enjoy the following spoof :

$\qquad\quad$ I remember once going to see him for the Holidays, and remarked that the number of the upcoming year seemed to me rather a dull one, and that I hoped it was not an unfavorable omen. "No," he replied, "it is a very interesting number; it is the smallest number which can be expressed as the product of three distinct primes, which are congruent modulo $17$." $:)$

Lucian
  • 48,334
  • 2
  • 83
  • 154
18

What it lacks in brevity, it makes up for in nerdiness:

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS$0$

Unwisdom
  • 4,510
  • 4
    I like it ;) although I have a feeling that writing this out on a board could be rather monotonous – James Williams Mar 07 '14 at 18:26
  • How is this $2014$? – K. Rmth Mar 07 '14 at 19:51
  • @K.Rmth well, it appears to be 2014 S's and 1 zero. Not sure what the 0 is for (or why S was chosen) – Tyler Mar 07 '14 at 19:59
  • 16
    @K.Rmth $S$ is the successor function. So, for example, $S(4) = 5$. In general, $S(x) = x + 1$. – Gamma Function Mar 07 '14 at 20:00
  • @Tyler S(0) = 1, S(S(0)) = S(1) = 2, etc. See above. – Gamma Function Mar 07 '14 at 20:00
  • 4
    Peano arithmetic has one constant symbol, 0, and one unary function symbol, $S$. Every natural number is either $0$ (in which case it is not the successor of anything) or the successor of some (unique) other natural number. Every natural number can thus be written as a finite number of applications of the successor function to the constant zero. Thus the natural numbers are defined recursively, which makes this essentially the minimal structure needed to enable inductive type proofs. (I'm simplifying slightly - some formulations of Peano Arithmetic permit nonstandard natural numbers.) – Unwisdom Mar 07 '14 at 20:23
13

Here are some cryptic ones: From the Gaussian integral we have $$2014 = \frac{4028}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-x^2}dx$$ and from the Basel Problem we have: $$2014 = \frac{12084}{\pi^2}\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}{\frac{1}{i^2}}$$ Here are some that (arguably) has deep meanings and roots: $$ 2014 = 2\cdot19\cdot53$$ $$2014 = 2^{11} - 34$$ For some trigonometry we have: $$2014 = \frac{4}{\cos^3{\frac{\pi}{9}}\cdot\cos^3{\frac{2\pi}{9}}\cdot\cos^3{\frac{4\pi}{9}}} - 34$$ It depends on perception, really. There are probably arguably infinitely many ways to write $2014$ in a "short, snappy, cool, and nerdy way".

Yiyuan Lee
  • 14,435
  • You definitely have the right idea here! I am intrigued as to how you worked out the first two in such a short time – James Williams Mar 07 '14 at 18:23
  • 1
    @JamesWilliams Well, you have 22014=4028 and 62014=12084, where the 2 and the 6 belonged to the (rather well known) cases where the 2014 is removed from both sides, and rearranged so the sum/integral are on their own side. – FireGarden Mar 07 '14 at 19:00
  • 2
    This answer misses the point. These identities don't reveal anything interesting about the number 2014. They would work for any number. – user85798 Mar 10 '14 at 05:29
13

How about

$$3\cdot6!-5!-4!-2!$$

or, if you like

$$(6!-5!)+(6!-4!)+(6!-2!)$$

Alternatively:

$$6!2!+4!4!-2!0!$$

Barry Cipra
  • 79,832
11

(Self answering question) Find the integral part of the unique real root of the equation $$\log_2 x+\log_{20}x+\log_{201}x+\log_{2014}x -2-0-14+\frac{1}{20+\frac{1}{14}} = 0$$

Lord Soth
  • 7,750
  • 20
  • 37
11

$$ 2014 = 2^{2\times2^2 \times (2\times2^2-2)}-2\times (2\times2)^2-2 $$

Equations like this can be made for any number, not just 2014.

6

Using a base 2014 number system, it would be expressed as:

10

ahorn
  • 2,236
5

Maybe do:

$$2014 = \sum_{k=0}^{11}\binom{11}{k}-34$$

Patrick
  • 2,106
5

Binary: 11111011110 Hexadecimal: 7DE

Image the students perplexing expression when they see: 1101/11/111111011110 or C/3/7DE Tell them to write this date in this form on there notes. Guaranteed they will show it to their friends or family.

Wow I can't believe I haven't thought of doing this with my students. As a rookie high school math teacher I am always looking for new 'hooks' with my students. Great idea and thank you!

Lesson planning using stack exchange? Who knew..

2

How about multiple mathematical formulae (using only digits and simple operators) for every year (except 2102) for the rest of the century? e.g.,

$$2014 = 10*9*8*7/6/5*4*3-2*1$$

Read more about this in the fascinating Wolfram Blog. To generate these equations, take a look at the answers for this SO question.

lifebalance
  • 111
  • 5
2

I would express this as a subtraction of powers of two, i.e. $$ 2^{11} - 2^5 - 2^1 $$

Mauren
  • 101
1

If anyone went to HCSSiM, we have a tradition of worshiping the number $17$.

So I would say the coolest way to express $2014$ is $$2014=2 \times 19 \times 51$$

It is easy to show that this neat fact: $2014$ is in fact the smallest number that can be expressed as a product of three distinct positive integers that are all congruent modulo $17$.