The isoperimetric inequality on the sphere of radius 1 asserts that for any closed curve on the sphere, $$L^2 \geq A(4\pi - A)$$ where $L$ is the length of the curve and $A$ is the area it encloses. There are a number of proofs of this; I am looking for a proof using the calculus of variations in the spirit of the proof of the standard isoperimetric inequality on the plane. I don't think this can be done, but I thought I'd see if others have an idea.
First, let us review the variational proof of the isoperimetric inequality on the plane. By Green's theorem, the area enclosed by a curve $(x(t), y(t))$ is given by: $$A = \int_a^b x(t)y'(t)\, dt$$ On the other hand the length is given by: $$L = \int_a^b \sqrt{x'(t)^2 + y'(t)^2}\, dt$$ Using Lagrange multipliers, we can maximize $A$ while treating $L$ as a constraint, and the isoperimetric inequality follows.
To adapt this idea to the sphere we would need to use Stokes' theorem instead of Green's theorem to manufacture a line integral which calculates surface area. Namely, we would need a vector field $\textbf{F}$ on $\mathbb{R}^3$ such that if $C$ is a closed curve on the sphere which is the boundary of a piece $S$ of the sphere then: $$\int_C \textbf{F}\cdot \textbf{T}\, ds = \iint_S \text{curl}\, \textbf{F} \cdot \textbf{n}\, dS = \iint_S dS$$ In other words we want to choose $\textbf{F}$ so that $\text{curl}\, \textbf{F} = \textbf{n}$, the outward unit normal vector of the sphere. But there can be no vector field in $\mathbb{R}^3$ whose curl is $\textbf{n}$ since the integral of $\textbf{n}$ over the sphere is $4\pi$ while the integral of the curl of a vector field over any closed surface is $0$ by Stokes' theorem.
This seems to suggest that you can't use the calculus of variations to prove the isoperimetric inequality on any closed surface, which is a bit disappointing. Is there any way to get around this problem?