I have to deteremine whether each of the following expressions is a well-formed expression of statement logic or not
(a) (r ∧ ¬r)
(b) q
(c) ¬( p) ∨ (q <-> p)
(d) ( p ∧ (q ∧ r) ∨ p)
(e) ∧ → pq
(f) ((r ∧ (q → p)) → r)
So my answers
(a) formula
(b) formula(any atomic statement is a wff
(c) not a formula (no parethesis around atomic statement)
(d) ? not a formula
(e) not a formula
(f) well-formed formula
I am not sure about (d). Perhaps somebody can explain it and check the rest?