Can someone please help me understand the following assertion:
All concrete mathematics of the past can be conducted in Peano Arithmetic.
This is from "A Brief Introduction to Unprovability" by Andrey Bovykin.
Bovykin says that theorems of $\mathsf{PA}$ capture ‘finite mathematics’, that is the world of mathematical theorems that can be formulated in $\mathcal L = \{+, \times,< ,0,1\}$ and whose proof does not require the use of any notion of ‘infinite set’ in an essential way.
He says ‘finite mathematics’ includes "all imaginable mathematics whose objects can be somehow finitely approximated or finitely encoded, including everyday ‘continuous’ mathematics".
I understand how $\mathsf{ZFC}$ can be a framework for `everyday mathematics' but I don't see how $\mathsf{PA}$ can be. For example, how can I even state the l.u.b. property of the reals using $\mathsf{PA}$?