It might be a silly question, but to me it is not obvious why the following expression holds:
$$ \lim\limits_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{0}{x}=0 ? $$
It might be a silly question, but to me it is not obvious why the following expression holds:
$$ \lim\limits_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{0}{x}=0 ? $$
A limit $L$ of a function $f(x)$ evaluated at a point $x = a$ is not necessarily the value $f(a)$ itself. It is a value for which $f(x)$ approaches $L$ "as close as we like" if we make $x$ "sufficiently close" but not equal to $a$. The subtlety is in how we mathematically formalize the language in quotation marks, which is how we arrived at the Cauchy definition of limit:
We say that $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to a} f(x) = L$ if, for any $\epsilon > 0$, there exists a $\delta > 0$ such that $|f(x) - L| < \epsilon$ whenever $0 < |x - a| < \delta$.
Of course, we do not need to appeal to such a definition in this case because as others have pointed out, $f(x) = 0/x = 0$ whenever $x \ne 0$; hence $$\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{0}{x} = \lim_{x \to 0} 0 = 0$$ directly, because again, the limit is evaluated by considering the behavior of $f(x)$ in a neighborhood of $a = 0$, not the value of $f(0)$.
$$\frac0{1}=0$$ $$\frac0{0.1}=0$$ $$\frac0{0.01}=0$$ $$\frac0{0.001}=0$$ $$\frac0{0.0001}=0$$ $$\frac0{0.00001}=0$$ $$\frac0{0.000001}=0$$ $$...$$
It's simple:
The limit is the value that the function approaches at that point, simply put, it depends on the neighboring values the function takes.
Take a graph of the function $f(x)=\frac{0}{x}$:

You see that from any possible angle, the only value the function approaches when $x\rightarrow0$ (or wherever in the known universe) is $0$.
A different scenario would appear with, for example, $f(x)=\frac{sin(x)}{x}$. Here, you can see in the plot that the line approaches $1$ as it gets close to $x=0$, that's why this limit is equal to 1.

And in both cases, $f(0) = \frac{0}{0}$. The function is, in both cases, undefined at that value of $x$, but the limit tells you toward which value it approaches.
You've received great answers thus far, so there's no need to repeat what's already been stated, and stated well.
I'll simply add this, for a different take, given that you've already encountered integrals and double integrals, I take it you've encountered L'Hospital for limits:
Even if you to try to evaluate at the limit at $x = 0,$ we get the indeterminate form $\dfrac 00$. By L'Hospital's rule, then, $$\lim_{x\to 0} \frac 0x = \lim_{x \to 0}\frac{(0)'}{(x)'} = \lim_{x\to 0} \frac 01 = 0.$$
This is true simply because as you take $x \to 0$ (for $x\ne 0$), we have $0/x=0$. (Think about the convergence of the sequence $0,0,0,0,\ldots$.) When you take the limit, you don't care about what happens when $x=0$; you only care about what happens around it.