Is squaring the circle possible in any sort of metric at all? It's known that within the Euclidean metric it is impossible, but does there exist some world or space where it is possible? Much like how $x^2+1$ has no solutions in the real field, but it does have solutions in the complex field.
-
1Is Taxicab Geometry allowed? – user137794 Sep 16 '14 at 02:34
-
Any sort of metric is allowed, I just want to see what metrics there are out there that allow such a thing. – Trogdor Sep 16 '14 at 02:43
-
I recollect that there are no Circles in Taxicab Geometry: all lines are either mutually parallel or perpendicular, as in the Manhattan Grid of New York City (you can only drive North and South, or East and West. – Ludvikus Jan 26 '23 at 01:09
2 Answers
Yes. On the ordinary sphere of radius $1,$ there are countably many pairs of "squares" and circles with equal areas, where both the (geodesic) radius of the circle and the length of the four sides of the square can be constructed. The limit of this is when both are a hemisphere, regarded as a square with four angles all equal to $\pi.$
Similar in the hyperbolic plane, countable number of pairs.
In both cases, there is no procedure for beginning with a circle of unknown radius and constructing the square with equal area, or for starting with a square of unknown edge length and producing the circle with equal area. Both figures must be constructed at the sam time, you might say.
See my article in the Intelligencer at and Marvin's article at http://www.maa.org/programs/maa-awards/writing-awards/old-and-new-results-in-the-foundations-of-elementary-plane-euclidean-and-non-euclidean-geometries
- 139,541
-
"See my article in the Intelligencer at http://zakuski.utsa.edu/~jagy/bib.html". I click, not found. Please update. – Oscar Lanzi Mar 10 '21 at 13:34
-
@OscarLanzi http://zakuski.utsa.edu/~jagy/papers/Intelligencer_1995.pdf The server that hosted my pages died. – Will Jagy Mar 10 '21 at 17:01
-
We usually define a circle of radius $r$ about a point $(x_0,y_0)$ in an $x,y$ coordinate plane by using the Euclidean metric $\|x,y\|_2 = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2}:$ we set $\|x-x_0, y-y_0\|_2 = r.$
If instead we use the taxicab metric, $\|x,y\|_1 = |x| + |y|,$ and define a circle of radius $r$ about $(x_0,y_0)$ as the set of points $(x,y)$ satisfying $\|x-x_0, y-y_0\|_2 = r,$ then every "circle" is what we would usually view as a square with its diagonals parallel to the axes.
If we use the metric $\|x,y\|_\infty = \max(|x|, |y|),$ so that the circle of radius $r$ about $(x_0,y_0)$ is defined by $\|x-x_0, y-y_0\|_\infty = r,$ the "circle" is what we would usually regard as a square whose sides are parallel to the axes.
But you would also require a definition of what it means for a figure to be a "square" with respect to either the $\|\cdot\|_1$ measure or the the $\|\cdot\|_\infty$ measure, and you would require a definition of "area" with respect to the same measure.
- 98,388