Questions tagged [abstract-algebra]

For questions about monoids, groups, rings, modules, fields, vector spaces, algebras over fields, various types of lattices, and other such algebraic objects. Associate with related tags like [group-theory], [ring-theory], [modules], etc. as necessary to clarify which topic of abstract algebra is most related to your question and help other users when searching.

Abstract algebra is the study of algebraic objects, i.e. sets endowed with one or more operations on the elements of those sets. In particular, the study of abstract algebra considers the algebraic structures and properties of which such operations induce. It can be considered as the generalization of the study of the algebraic structure of the integers and real numbers (arithmetic), or the study of matrices and vector spaces (linear algebra).

Some algebraic objects are monoids, groups, rings, fields, vector spaces, modules, algebras, and categories, among many other less prominent objects.

Examples

  1. The set of non-negative integers $\mathbb{N} = \{0,1,2,3,\dotsc\}$ is a monoid under the operation $+$.

  2. The integers $\mathbb{Z} = \{\dotsc,-1,0,1,\dotsc\}$ under the binary operation of $+$ form a group.

  3. Furthermore, $\mathbb{Z}$ has the structure of a ring when you consider it as being equipped with both addition and multiplication.

  4. The real numbers $\mathbb{R}$ with their usual addition and multiplication form a field.

  5. The set of $n\times n$ matrices with entries in $\mathbb{R}$ with matrix addition and multiplication form a ring.

  6. The set of $1\times n$ vectors over the real numbers, with vector addition, and multiplication by elements of the $n\times n$ real matrices on the right are an example of a module for the ring of matrices.

In addition to studying the objects themselves, abstract algebra considers homomorphisms between the objects and various constructions and tools, which are useful for studying the objects.

85022 questions
3
votes
4 answers

how do I prove that $\mathbb{Q} [x]/\langle x^2 – 2 \rangle$ is a field

how do I prove that $\mathbb{Q} [x]/\langle x^2 – 2\rangle$ is a field? Is it enough to show that each since each class can be written as $[ax+b]$, then if $a=0$, $b$ is a constant which is an element of $\mathbb{Q}$. and if $b = 0$, then there…
Andrea
  • 41
3
votes
2 answers

How to build a subgroup $H\leq S_4$ having order $8$?

Can anyone explain me what would be the procedure for building a subgroup $H\leq S_4$ of order $8$? I started obviously as $H=\{id$. Then I added two disjoint $2$-cycles $(1\ 2), (3\ 4)$ for they commute and they are equal to their inverse, that…
PtF
  • 9,655
3
votes
1 answer

About a well-defined homomorphism

Suppose $G_1$, $G_2$ are groups and $N_1 \subset G_1$, $N_2 \subset G_2$ are normal subgroups. Let $f:G_1\to G_2$ be a homomorphism. When is $\bar{f}(N_1 g) = N_2 f(g)$ a well-defined homomorphism from $G_1/N_1$ to $G_2/N_2$?
Anonnon
  • 43
3
votes
3 answers

Non isomorphic groups

How many non isomorphic groups are there 1) that have 2 elements 2) that have 3 elements My solution: 1) There must be a identity element in a group and for each element $x$ there also has to be $x^{-1}$. If we look at 2 element groups, one of the…
3
votes
1 answer

Is the converse of the first isomorphism theorem true?

Let $G,H$ be groups and $N$ be a normal subgroup of $H$. Assume $G\cong H/N$. Then, does there exist a epimorphism $\phi:H\rightarrow G$ with a kernel $N$?
Rubertos
  • 12,491
3
votes
2 answers

Characterization of a vector space over an associative division ring

Let $M$ be a (left) module over an associative division ring $R$. Then it has the following properties. 1) For every submodule $N$ of $M$, there exists a submodule $L$ such that $M = N + L$ and $M \cap L = 0$. 2) Every finitely generated submodule…
user177230
3
votes
1 answer

Minimal Number of Generators of a Module

In commutative algebra, for a module $M$ over a (possibly unital) commutative ring $R$, when is the number $\mu_R(M)$ well-defined? For example, if $R$ is a local ring, then (by Nakayama Lemma and elementary linear algebra), any minimal generating…
3
votes
2 answers

How does a set of functions form a monoid?

While I now understand what monoids are I am still not sure how a set of functions, under composition defines a monoid. The main difficulty I am having is understanding how you can define composition. I mean for integers under $+$ it's easy. Define…
3
votes
2 answers

Cyclic groups under mod p multiplication?

I have a quick question: How does a cyclic group form under $\bmod {p}$ multiplication? (Reading from: http://dogschool.tripod.com/cyclic.html) I really think I should know this, but, I really don't understand it, at the moment.
3
votes
1 answer

Proving that the symmetric difference of sets is a group

I wanted to ask about this problem. My book states: Let the symmetric difference be defined as $A + B=(A\setminus B) \cup (B \setminus A)$. It proceeds to define a power set as $P_D= \left\{ A:A \subseteq D\right\}$ It then asks me to…
3
votes
2 answers

Multiplication by zero in an algebra over a field: $0x=0$ for every $x$?

If I have an algebra $A$ over a field $F$ and the zero element is $0\in A$. Is it true that $x0=0x=0$ for every $x\in A$? Thanks a lot!
EQJ
  • 4,369
3
votes
0 answers

$x^3+nx+2$ is irreducible over ${\mathbb Z}$ for $n\neq 1,\ -3\ -5$

I want to show that $$x^3+nx +2 $$ is irreducible over ${\bf Z}$ for $n\neq 1,\ -3\ -5$ By Eisenstein, if $n$ is even then it is irreducible. How can we solve odd case ? [add] Note that factorization is one of these : $$ (x\pm 2)(x^2+ax\pm 1),\…
HK Lee
  • 19,964
3
votes
2 answers

Quotient Gaussian Integers

Following Quotient ring of Gaussian integers, their extended conclusion is $\mathbb{Z}[i]/(a-ib) \cong \mathbb{Z}/(a^{2}+b^{2})\mathbb{Z}$. However it does not convince me, at least, one example below: Let $a=2,b=0$, I cannot find explicit…
Yi W
  • 41
3
votes
0 answers

"Type" in specifying a ring/ field

In the definition of fields on wikipedia, it says: A field is therefore an algebraic structure $\langle \Bbb F, +, \cdot , −, ^{−1}, 0, 1\rangle$; of type $\langle 2, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0\rangle$, consisting of two abelian groups... I understand that a…
3
votes
2 answers

An onto ring morphism from a field to a ring must be a bijection

Given $F$ is a field, $R$ is a ring, and $\phi:F\to R$ is a surjective ring homomorphism. How do we prove that this makes $\phi$ is a bijection and $R$ is a field. Simplest possible explanation is most appreciated! I am looking for an intuitive…