Questions tagged [dynamical-systems]

In dynamical systems, the motion of a particle in some geometric space, governed by some time dependent rules, is studied. The process can be discrete (where the particle jumps from point to point) or continuous (where the particle follows a trajectory). Dynamical systems is used in mathematical models of diverse fields such as classical mechanics, economics, traffic modelling, population dynamics, and biological feedback.

A dynamical system is, very broadly, a system which changes in time according to some rules. One concrete example of a dynamical system is the following.

Example 1: A billiard ball moving on a frictionless billiards table. In this example, what is changing in time is the position of the ball. There are two rules governing this motion, namely that the ball will travel at the same speed for all time, and that the ball will bank off a rail at the same angle that it hit the rail.

Given an initial position and velocity for the ball, these two rules enable one to compute the trajectory of the ball for all time. This illustrates an important property of dynamical systems: they are deterministic. The rules governing the dynamical system should, at least in theory, allow one to determine the state of the system at every point in the future, given some initial data. Another, more abstract, example of a dynamical system is

Example 2: A function $f\colon X\to X$, where $X$ is a set. In this example, one thinks of $X$ as a space in which a particle is moving, and $f$ as a rule governing the motion of the particle. Explicitly, if the particle is at the point $x_0\in X$ at time $t = 0$, then at time $t = 1$ it is at the point $x_1:= f(x_0)$, and at time $t = 2$ it is at the point $x_2 := f(x_1)$, etc.

Given the initial position $x_0$ of the particle, its position at time $t = n$ is therefore $f^{\circ n}(x_0)$, where $f^{\circ n}$ denotes the composition of $f$ with itself $n$ times. In this example, studying the dynamical system is equivalent to studying the iterates of $f$

Notice that in example 1 the position of the ball is defined for every time $t>0$, whereas in example 2 the position of the particle is only defined at positive integer values of time. Example 1 is called a continuous time dynamical system, and example 2 is called a discrete time dynamical system. These are the most commonly studied dynamical systems.

In both continuous and discrete time dynamical systems, the most commonly asked questions are the following:

  1. What is the trajectory of the system given specified initial conditions? While these trajectories can be computed in theory, in practice they are often difficult to impossible to compute.
  2. What is the long term behavior of the system? What happens after a long time, i.e., as $t\to\infty$?
  3. Are there any initial conditions which lead to "special" trajectories? For instance, in example 1, if the ball is hit from the center of the table along a line perpendicular to a rail, then its trajectory will be periodic, that is, it will repeat itself forever.

Continuous time dynamical systems

The most classical examples of dynamical systems are continuous time dynamical systems coming from physics. The motion of a particle moving in space under some force is a standard system; the rules governing the system in this situation are Newton's laws of motion. Another common systems are the diffusion of heat through a material, which is determined by the heat equation, or the motion of particles in a fluid, which is determined by a flow.

In each of these, as in most continuous time dynamical systems, the rules governing the system are a system of differential equations. Because of this, there is a great deal of overlap between the study dynamical systems and differential equations. Questions about the asymptotic behavior of solutions of differential equations very often fall under the heading of dynamical systems.

Discrete time dynamical systems

A discrete time dynamical system is given by a function $f\colon X\to X$, where $X$ is a set. In this generality, such a system is hard to study. Usually one imposes more structure:

  • If $X$ is a topological space and $f$ is continuous, it is called a topological dynamical system.
  • If $X$ is a manifold and $f$ is smooth, is it called a smooth dynamical system.
  • If $X$ is a complex manifold and $f$ is holomorphic, it is called a complex dynamical system.
  • If $X$ is a measure space and $f$ is measurable, it is called a measurable dynamical system.

Each of these types of dynamical systems has a rich theory behind it.

Chaos and ergodic theory

The most interesting dynamical systems are those that exhibit chaotic behavior. For instance, in example 1, suppose one hits the ball from the center of the table in a certain direction, and on another table one hits the ball from the center of the table in a slightly different direction. Then, after a long period of time, the trajectories of the two balls will diverge and be very different. Thus a slight change in initial conditions (direction the ball is hit) results in very different behavior of the two systems. Such extreme sensitivity to initial conditions is referred to as chaotic behavior.

Systems which exhibit chaotic behavior, while interesting, are often more difficult to study. A common method for approaching such systems is to use statistical and probabilistic methods. In example 1, for instance, instead of asking where the ball is at some very large time $t$ (which could be difficult to compute), one could ask where the ball is most likely to be at time $t$. Such questions are usually easier to approach, and fall under the heading of ergodic theory.

7122 questions
2
votes
1 answer

Proving semi-conjugacy preserves chaotic behavior

http://www.math.upatras.gr/~bountis/files/def-eq.pdf In the above documentation it states "It is easy to check that a semiconjugacy also preserves chaotic behavior on intervals of finite length" on page 341 (PDF page 356) , but I am not seeing how.…
javan
  • 21
2
votes
1 answer

Dynamical systems: Luenberger observers, how to calculate the gain matrix and apply them?

Summary For the dynamical system given below, which defines a Luenberger observer, how does one explicitly obtain a value for the observer gain, $L$? $\hat{x}(k+1) = A \hat{x}(k) + B u(k) + L[y(k) - \hat{y}(k)]$ $\hat{y}(k) = C \hat{x}(k)$ Are my…
JPI
  • 300
2
votes
2 answers

Calculate second and third iterations

Let $$L_\mu(x) = \mu x(1-x)$$ Calculate $$L_\mu^2(x)$$ and $$L_\mu^3(x)$$ I understand how this works when given f(x) but I don't understand how to do this with mu in the function.
Peach212
  • 29
  • 2
2
votes
1 answer

Showing that there is a continuous semi-conjugacy from $R_{\alpha}$ to $R_{k \alpha}$.

I'm currently studying the topic of endomorphisms and translations of topological groups within dynamical systems, and came across the following exercise: Show that for any $k \in \mathbb{Z}, k \neq 0$, there is a continuous semi-conjugacy from…
Ruben
  • 411
2
votes
0 answers

Using Poincaré-Bendixson Theorem for the Van der Pol oscillator

Statement: Use the Poincaré-Bendixson Theorem to show that the Van der Pol oscillator $$ \ddot{x}+\varepsilon(x^2-1)\dot{x}+x = 0,\; \; \varepsilon >0 $$ has at least one stable limit cycle for sufficiently small values of $\varepsilon$. Approach:…
2
votes
2 answers

convergence of vectors

Let $x_i, y_i \in \mathbb{R}^n$, and $F,G: \mathbb{R}^n \times \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}^n$. Consider sequences of vectors $$x_{i+1} = F(x_i, y_i)$$ $$y_{i+1} = G(y_i, x_i)$$ I have two related questions. What properties should functions $F$ and…
ashim
  • 904
2
votes
2 answers

Topological dynamical system question - For a point y in a space, find a point whose orbit converges to y

Let $\alpha$ be irrational, and define a map on the torus $T : \mathbb{T}^2 \to \mathbb{T}^2$ to be such that $T(x_1, x_2) = (x_1 + \alpha \mod1,\ 2 x_2\mod 1)$. Define metric $d$ on the torus to be the usual metric (i.e. the length of the shortest…
24601
  • 777
2
votes
1 answer

About expansive homeomorphism on a compact metric space

Let $X$ be a compact infinte metric space and $f:X\to X$ an expansive homeomorphism. (Mapping $f:X\to X$ is expansive if $(\exists \epsilon >0)(\forall x\neq y)(\exists n\in \mathbb{Z}) d(f^n(x),f^n(y)) > \epsilon$ or, equivalent: $(\exists \epsilon…
blue
  • 816
2
votes
1 answer

Poincaré-Bendixson Theorem and Limit Cycle:find the trapping region

$\dfrac{dx_1}{dt} = x_2 - x_1^3 + x_1$ $\dfrac{dx_2}{dt} = -x_1 - x_2^3 + x_2$ Hi, I have been given the non-linear system as above and I need to show if there exists limit cycle in the annular region $1 \leq r \leq \sqrt{2}$ I need help in applying…
Arv
  • 41
  • 3
2
votes
1 answer

How to show the uniqueness of the solution of the time dependent linear system in $\mathbb{R}^n$?

Consider the time dependent linear system in $\mathbb{R}^n$: $$ \dot{x} = Ax + b(t), $$ where $b: \mathbb{R}^n \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n$ is continuous. Prove that $$ x(t) = e^{At}x_0 + \int_0^t e^{A(t-s)}b(s)d(s), \tag{1} $$ for $t \in \mathbb{R}$…
Saeed
  • 175
2
votes
2 answers

Polar coordinates questions

Using polar coordinates, create a system with a fixed point at the origin, and with infinitely many periodic orbits which alternate between clockwise and counterclockwise flows.
user9124
2
votes
0 answers

Strogatz Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos 4.1.9

I'm struggling with exercise 4.1.9 of Strogatz's Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos. The questions asks: "In exercises 2.6.2 and 2.7.7 you were asked to give two analytical proofs that periodic solutions are impossible for vector fields on the line.…
2
votes
1 answer

Hartman-Grobman Theorem

The H-G Theorem say that if the singularity is hyperbolic (all the eigenvalues of the "linearized" system have a not null real part), then in an environment of the singularity the phase portrait is topologically conjugated to that of the linearized…
2
votes
0 answers

Invariant cones in Katok-Hasselblatt

I'm having trouble understanding a lemma presented in Katok & Hasselblatt Introduction to the modern theory of dynamical systems (p.247). Here's the said lemma : I don't understand the second part of the proof. More specifically, how does it come…
Hermès
  • 2,647
2
votes
1 answer

Center Manifold Theorem.

Consider a continuous-time dynamical system defined by \begin{equation} \dot{x}=f(x),\ \ \ \ \ \ x\in\mathbb R^{n} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (1) \end{equation} where f is sufficiently smooth, $f(0) = 0$. Let the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix A evaluated at…
Mark
  • 7,841
  • 6
  • 38
  • 72