Questions tagged [equivalence-relations]

For questions about relations that are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. These are relations that model a sense of "equality" between elements of a set. Consider also using the (relation) tag.

An equivalence relation is a particular kind of relation that models a notion of "equality" between elements of a set. A relation $R$ on a set $X$ will be an equivalence relation if it satisfies the following properties:

  • Reflexive – For each $a \in X$, we have $a \mathrel{R} a$.
  • Symmetric – For any $a,b \in X$, $a \mathrel{R} b$ if and only if $b \mathrel{R} a$
  • Transitive – For any $a,b,c \in X$, if $a \mathrel{R} b$ and $b \mathrel{R} c$, then $a \mathrel{R} c$.

Commonly the symbols $\equiv$ or $\cong$ or $\simeq$ or $=$ are used for equivalence relations instead of the letter $R$. Here are some examples of equivalence relations:

  • On the set $\mathbf{Z}$ of integers define the relation $\equiv_{37}$ on $\mathbf{Z}\times \mathbf{Z}$ by saying $a\equiv_{37} b$ if both $a$ and $b$ give the same remainder when divided by $37$. If $a \equiv_{37} b$ we say that $a$ and $b$ are congruent modulo $37$.

  • Let $T$ be the set of all triangles in the plane. An example of an equivalence relation on $T$ is the relation of two triangles being congruent.

3120 questions
2
votes
1 answer

Explanation of $\mathbb{Z}/_5$

can someone explain me the following please?: $\mathbb{Z} /_5 = \{ [0]_5, [1]_5, [2]_5, [3]_5, [4]_5\}$ Is that correct? $[0]_5 = \{ \dotsc, -15, -10, -5, 0, 5, 10, 15, \dotsc\}$ $[1]_5 = \{ \dotsc, -14, -9, -4, 1, 6, 11, 16, \dotsc\}$ $[2]_5 = \{…
Chris
  • 521
2
votes
1 answer

Finding the equivalence relations determined by functions

I have a homework question: Consider the maps: $$f : \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R},\; (x,y) \mapsto x^2 +y^2$$ $$f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R},\; x \mapsto x^3$$ $$f : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C},\; z \mapsto z^3$$ Determine the equivalence relation on…
user82004
2
votes
1 answer

How I can define an equivalence relation?

Let $f:ℝ→ℝ$ be a real analytic function. Assume that $f$ has infinitely may zeros. Let $D$ be the set values of the function $f$. I want to construct a partition of $D$ as follow: $D=D₁∪D₂$ where $D₁= \{ x∈D:f(x)=0 \} $ and $D₂= \{ x∈D:f(x)≠0 \} $.…
DER
  • 3,011
2
votes
1 answer

How many equivalence-relations does the class have?

A is the set of all numbers with four digits that can be created with odd numbers! Example: [1111] [1,3,5,7] belongs to A. xRy if and only if the sum of the four numbers that x have is the same sum of yś four digits! Example: [1,3,5,7]R[9,1,3,3] How…
Bojack
  • 163
2
votes
0 answers

Objects that change their equivalence class under some transformation

Suppose there is a set of objects on which we can define an equivalence relation. Under some transformations of the space on which the objects are defined, these objects may change their equivalence class. As a trivial example consider vectors on a…
Damian
  • 21
2
votes
1 answer

Determining if this set is an equivalence relation verification

I am asked to show the follow set if an equivalence relation on a given set. So I have: Set: A=Map$(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$ Relation: $f \sim g$ if $f(0)=g(0)$ or $f(1)=g(1)$. I know that this is not an equivalence relation but I was wondering if…
2
votes
0 answers

Prove that $ R $ is an equivalence relation.

Let $ R $ be a relation on a set $ A $, and suppose that $ R $ is symmetric and transitive. Show that if for every $ x \in A $, there exists $ y \in A $ such that $ xRy $, then $ R $ is an equivalence relation. My attempt What you really have to…
asd asd
  • 533
2
votes
1 answer

Equivalence class and how to find it

I need to find equivalence classes of relation $\sim$ \begin{array}{l} x\sim y \Leftrightarrow 4 \mid\left(x^{3}-y^{3}\right) \\ \text { for } x, y \in \mathbb{Z} \end{array} I have shown that $\sim$ is equivalence relation. I blind guessed that…
2
votes
1 answer

Numerical equivalence between sets

I need some help on homework. Here is the problem I am stuck on: Prove that every closed interval [a,b] is numerically equivalent to [0,1] I believe that I need to find an injection between the two sets. But I'm not sure how to get there. Any help…
user69839
  • 113
  • 3
  • 9
2
votes
1 answer

Unique Equivalence Relation after a partition of S

Suppose that S is a nonempty set and C is a partition of S. Show that there is a unique equivalence relation ∼ on S with equivalence classes being the sets in C. By unique I mean there exist a few equivalence classes such that they are different. My…
Twilight
  • 553
2
votes
1 answer

Prove that or any partition P of S, there is an equivalence relation on S whose equivalence classes are the elements of P.

Prove that or any partition P of S, there is an equivalence relation on S whose equivalence classes are the elements of P. However its converse is easy,any hints how to begin the proof. I guess i have to define a equivalence relation wisely.
M Desmond
  • 792
2
votes
0 answers

Does defining all equivalence classes within a set define an equivalence relation on that set?

I am just starting to learn about equivalence relations and have a question that I think will help solidify my understanding. Say you want to define an equivalence relation on set $A$. Is it sufficient to define $S_1, S_2,...,$ and $S_k$ such that…
2
votes
1 answer

Showing equivalence relations a=b/a=-b

I have this equivalence relation where $S=\mathbb{R}$ and $a\sim b$ $ \iff a=b$ or $a=-b$ I know this is an equivalence relation and that it is also very simple but I am just confused about how to test for reflectivity, symmetry and transitivity?…
user635953
2
votes
1 answer

Equivalence relations on an arbitrary set with constraints in the form a~b

Let S = {a,b,c,d,e}. Determine how many equivalence relations can be defined on S with constraint: a~c, d~c and c not~ e. My approach is this: Find the equivalence classes, which are [a] = {a,c,d} = [c] = [d]. [b] = {b} [e] = {e} Is it correct to…
2
votes
2 answers

Finding equivalence classes in $\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}$

We have this relation on $\mathbb{R}^* \times \mathbb{R}^*$ defined by: $(x,y) \sim (a,b)$ if $xa > 0$ and $yb>0$. I have proven it is an equivalence relation, and I know the equivalence classes should be four: the set of all $x$ and $a$ positive,…
bluemuse
  • 309
  • 1
  • 7
1 2
3
23 24