Questions tagged [equivalence-relations]

For questions about relations that are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. These are relations that model a sense of "equality" between elements of a set. Consider also using the (relation) tag.

An equivalence relation is a particular kind of relation that models a notion of "equality" between elements of a set. A relation $R$ on a set $X$ will be an equivalence relation if it satisfies the following properties:

  • Reflexive – For each $a \in X$, we have $a \mathrel{R} a$.
  • Symmetric – For any $a,b \in X$, $a \mathrel{R} b$ if and only if $b \mathrel{R} a$
  • Transitive – For any $a,b,c \in X$, if $a \mathrel{R} b$ and $b \mathrel{R} c$, then $a \mathrel{R} c$.

Commonly the symbols $\equiv$ or $\cong$ or $\simeq$ or $=$ are used for equivalence relations instead of the letter $R$. Here are some examples of equivalence relations:

  • On the set $\mathbf{Z}$ of integers define the relation $\equiv_{37}$ on $\mathbf{Z}\times \mathbf{Z}$ by saying $a\equiv_{37} b$ if both $a$ and $b$ give the same remainder when divided by $37$. If $a \equiv_{37} b$ we say that $a$ and $b$ are congruent modulo $37$.

  • Let $T$ be the set of all triangles in the plane. An example of an equivalence relation on $T$ is the relation of two triangles being congruent.

3120 questions
3
votes
0 answers

Define ~ on $\mathbb{R}^2$ by $(x_1,y_1)\sim(x_2,y_2)$ iff $x_1-x_2$ is an integer. Is this an equivalence relation?

Further i) Give a geometric description of the equivalence class to which(0,0) belongs. ii) Is the number of equivalence classes finite? My approach is as below: Equivalence Relation Reflexive: $\forall (x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2, (x,y)\sim(x,y)$ since…
3
votes
2 answers

Equivalence classes of "$x \sim y \Longleftrightarrow x -y $ is rational".

Given the equivalence relation $x \sim y \Longleftrightarrow x -y $ is rational on the interval $[0,1)$. How do we reason* that there are uncountably infinite number of equivalence classes? *A rigorous proof is not required but still…
Legendre
  • 2,845
3
votes
3 answers

Classes of an equivalence relation

Let $R$ be the equivalence relation on the real numbers given by $$R = \{(x, y) \in \Bbb R^2: (x−y)(x+y) = 0 \} $$ What are the equivalence classes of $R$? So I wrote that, for every $x \in \Bbb R$, the corresponding equivalence class is…
user600210
3
votes
1 answer

Breaking an equivalence relation into equivalence classes

Consider the relation $S$ defined on the set $X = \{1, 2, \cdots, 99\}$ as$$ x\mathrel{S}y \Longleftrightarrow x − y \text{ is a multiple of } 11. $$ Into how many classes does it partition the set $X$? According to what was explained,…
3
votes
2 answers

An equivalence relation on $\mathbb{R}^2\setminus \{(0,0)\}$ (Resolved)

So this is from one of my homework problems in which we consider the map $f:\mathbb{R}^2\setminus \{(0,0)\} \to \mathbb{R}^2\setminus \{(0,0)\}$ where $f(x,y)=(2x,\frac{1}{2}y)$. Then it goes like "let $\sim$ be the equivalence relation generated by…
3
votes
1 answer

Why is $p(z) = \frac{e^z}{1 + e^z} \color{red}{\equiv} \frac{1}{1 + e^{-z}}$ and not $=$?

Is it because of the division of the whole term by $e^z$? So, it would not be allowed to write $=$? $\displaystyle \frac{1}{1 + 2^{-1}} = \frac{1}{1 + 0.5} = \frac{1}{1.5}$ has to be written with $=$, but it may not be written with $\equiv$.…
Nemgathos
  • 167
3
votes
2 answers

Equivalence Classes in the cartesian plane

The relation $\sim$ on $R \times R$ is defined by $(a,b) \sim (c,d)$ iff $a^2 +b^2 = c^2 + d^2$. I have already proven that this is an equivalence relation but I need to give a geometric description of the equivalence classes and I'm not sure how. …
3
votes
2 answers

Doesn't symmetry and transitivity imply reflexitivity?

I've been wondering recently the following: Let $\sim $ be a symmetric and transitive relation defined on $S $. Let $a \sim b $, which implies $b \sim a $ by symmetry, and by transitivity, $a \sim a $. Hence, $\sim $ is reflexive. I can't think of…
3
votes
6 answers

Why $yC_1x \iff yC_2x$ implies $C_1 = C_2$? $C_i$ is a relation.

Here is the text from the book Topology by Munkres: Studying equivalence relations on a set $A$ and studying partitions of $A$ are really the same thing. Given any partition $\scr D$ of $A$, there is exactly one equivalence relation on $A$ from…
user200918
3
votes
1 answer

Prove that multiplication is well defined

Let $M = \mathbb{N} \ \mathbb{x} \ \mathbb{N}$. We define the following relation on $M$. Let $(a,b)R(a',b')$ iff $a + b'=a'+b$ We define the set of intergers $\mathbb{Z}$, to be the set of equivalence classes of $M$ under the equivalence relation…
Olba12
  • 2,579
3
votes
2 answers

Defining an equivalence relation

For the set $ \Bbb R$, define two elements in $ \Bbb R$ to be equivalent if their difference belongs to $ \Bbb Q$. I can prove that this defines an equivalence relation. (see Verify an equivalence relation.) However, I would like to be able to…
Alan Ox
  • 189
2
votes
3 answers

How many times can transitivity property be applied

Can transitivity property be applied for infinite number of times for a certain problem??
girl101
  • 333
2
votes
1 answer

Axioms of equivalence relation in terms of the subset $R$

..An equivalence relation on $S$ is determined by the subset $R$ of $ S \times S$ consisting of those pairs $\left(a,b\right)$ such that $a \sim b$. Write the axioms for an equivalence relation in terms of the subset $R$. Since I was not getting any…
tattwamasi amrutam
  • 12,802
  • 5
  • 38
  • 73
2
votes
2 answers

$aRb$ if and only if $a=b$ or $a-b=2^n$ for a natural number $n$

Is $R$ reflexive? Is $R$ symmetric? Is $R$ transitive? I know $a=b$ is an equivalence relation so it is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. I know $a-b=2^n$ is reflexive but not symmetric or transitive. Not symmetric because: $6-2=2^2$ but $2-6$…
Sally
  • 21
2
votes
1 answer

Determining equivalence classes on $\Bbb{R}$.

Say we have the following equivalence relation on $\Bbb{R}$: $$a\sim b\iff a-b\in\Bbb{Q}$$ What do the equivalence classes look like? On a preliminary investigation I got the following equivalence classes: $\Bbb{Q}$ and $\Bbb{Q}+r$, where $r$ is any…
1
2
3
23 24