Questions tagged [finite-fields]

Finite fields are fields (number systems with addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division) with only finitely many elements. They arise in abstract algebra, number theory, and cryptography. The order of a finite field is always a prime power, and for each prime power $q$ there is a single isomorphism type. It is usually denoted by $\mathbb{F}_q$ or $\operatorname{GF}(q)$.

The order of a finite field is always a prime power, and for each prime power $q = p^r$ with $p$ prime there is a single isomorphism type. It is usually denoted by $\mathbb{F}_q$ or $\operatorname{GF}(q)$. The finite field $\mathbb F_q$ has characteristic $p$.

In the case $r = 1$ (i.e. $q = p$), a representative of $\mathbb F_p$ is given by the ring $\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}$ of integers residue classes modulo $p$. For $r \geq 2$, $\mathbb F_q$ can be constructed by a quotient ring $\mathbb{F}_p[x]/\langle f(x)\rangle$, where $f\in\mathbb F_p[x]$ is an irreducible polynomial of degree $r$.


Questions about finite fields typically fall into one of the following groups:

1: Questions arising in introductory level courses on abstract algebra. Here abstract-algebra is a suitable related tag.

2: Questions about solvability of higher degree congruences and/or factorization of polynomials with integer coefficients modulo a prime number often need basic facts about finite fields. This kind of questions are adequately tagged with polynomials and/or elementary-number-theory. Adding a finite-fields tag may help, but may not be necessary to attract quality answers.

3: Finite fields naturally occur in algebraic-number-theory as their properties are used heavily in the study of prime ideals and their behavior under field extensions. Use the tags jointly, if you see the need for it. A rich area in the intersection of finite fields and number theory is that of characters, most notably character sums. For the latter exponential-sums is an appropriate auxiliary tag.

4: Many error-correcting codes use a finite-field as the alphabet representing data, and such codes depend heavily on the properties of the alphabet fields. Use the coding-theory tag in conjunction with finite-fields, if your question is under this umbrella. Another rich source of applications of finite fields is cryptography.

5: There are special questions considering algebraic varieties and/or algebraic groups over finite fields. Here my recommendation is to use algebraic-geometry or algebraic-groups as the primary tag, and finite-fields as an auxiliary tag. This way your question will most likely attract the attention of those members who are best placed to answer it.


WARNING1: A relatively common mistake is to assume that finite-fields is an appropriate tag for questions about finite field extensions. There the word 'finite' is an attribute of the word 'extension' meaning that the dimension of the larger field as a vector space over the smaller one is finite. If that is what your question is about, you should use some combination of the tags galois-theory, field-theory, extension-field.


WARNING2: Another common source of confusion is the following. It is a well-known fact that a finite subgroup of the multiplicative group of any field is cyclic. Thus the entire multiplicative group of a finite field is cyclic. Any generator $g\in\Bbb{F}_q^*$ of the multiplicative group is called a primitive element. This is a natural extension of the concept of a primitive root in the multiplicative group $\Bbb{Z}/p\Bbb{Z}^*$ of the residue class ring. Unfortunately it is in conflict with the common practice of general field theory to call an element $z\in L$ primitive (w.r.t. the field extension $K/L$), if $L=K(z)$. In the case of finite fields we require more from a primitive element.

An irreducible polynomial $m(x)\in\Bbb{F}_p$ of degree $r$, is called a primitive polynomial, if any (and hence all) of its zeros in $\Bbb{F}_q$ are primitive elements. IOW, primitive polynomials are exactly the minimal polynomials (over the prime field) of primitive elements. This is another unfortunate source of confusion, for in the theory of polynomials over PIDs a polynomial is called primitive, if its coefficients have no non-unital common divisors. This is rarely very confusing for over a field this alternative concept of primitivity is patently meaningless.

Primitive polynomials are extremely useful in software implementations of the arithmetic of a moderate size finite field. This is largely because having a primitive polynomial at hand allows one to generate look-up-tables for both the base $g$ discrete logarithm as well as its inverse function. See this CW question for examples.

For that reason extensive tables of primitive polynomials have been generated. One such table is here.


Learn more: The tome for the keen students of finite fields is the book by Rudolf Lidl and Harald Niederreiter.

5331 questions
1
vote
2 answers

Fermat's Little Theorem and polynomials

We know that in $F_p[y]$, $y^p-y=y(y-1)(y-2)\cdots (y-(p-1))$. Let $g(y)\in F_p[y]$. Why is it valid to set $y=g(y)$ in the above equation to obtain $g(y)^p-g(y)=g(y)(g(y)-1)\cdots (g(y)-(p-1))$. This is done in Theorem 1 of Chapter 22 of A Concrete…
Pele
  • 13
1
vote
2 answers

How to prove that order of a field is a power of its characteristic?

How to prove that order of a field $\mathbb{GF}(q)$ is a power of its characteristic $\lambda$? What I can say is that every field has a subfield of order $\lambda$ if it helps
1
vote
1 answer

generalization of $X^p-X=0$ to $X^{p^n}-X=0$ about finite fields when $p$ is prime

By Fermat's little theorem, we know if $p$ is a prime number, we have: $$a^p\equiv a\,\,\,(\text{mod }p).$$ We know in a finite field $F$ of order $p$ when $p$ is prime, characteristic of $F$ is $p$. So, using Fermat's little theorem $a^p=xp+a$ for…
1
vote
2 answers

Do two primitive $n$-th roots of unity over $\mathbb{F}_p$ induce a nice correspondence between the irreducible factors of $x^n-1$?

Let $\alpha,\beta$ be primitive $n$-th roots of unity in an extension of $\mathbb{F}_p$ ($p$ prime). Let $S$ be the set of irreducible factors (over $\mathbb{F}_p$) of $x^n-1$. Is there a function $F:S\rightarrow S$ satisfying the following…
Gils
  • 1,019
  • 8
  • 15
1
vote
2 answers

number of quadratic Ireducible Polynomial over the field $\mathbb{F}_2$

Could anyone help me : What is the way of finding the number of Ireducible quadratic Polynomial over the field $\mathbb{F}_2$? Thank you for help.
Myshkin
  • 35,974
  • 27
  • 154
  • 332
1
vote
1 answer

Primes for which 2 and -2 are residues.

I know that 2 is a residue of primes of the form $8n+1$ and $8n+7$ and so on. I want to find a purely group theoretic or field theoretic proof of these statements. For example, for 8n+1, the multiplicative group is of the order of 8 and so there…
user32779
1
vote
0 answers

Solving a quadratic equation in finite fields

I'm learning finite fields. The equation $ax^2 + bx + c = 0$ can be solved in the reals trivially. If $a, b, c, x$ are elements of a finite field, is there a procedure to solve it?
SRobertJames
  • 4,278
  • 1
  • 11
  • 27
1
vote
1 answer

Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?

Normally I see $GF(p^n)$ defined in terms of a reducing polynomial $P(x)$ of degree n, where the coefficients are elements of $GF(p)$. For example, $GF(2)[x]/\langle x^4+x+1 \rangle$ or $GF(2)[x]/\langle x^8+x^4+x^3+x+1 \rangle$. The number of…
rcgldr
  • 546
1
vote
0 answers

Counting the number of polynomials of degree $q$ wich vanishes in $F_q(X)$

Let $q$ the power of a prime number $p$ count the number of polynomials $f(X)\in F_q[X]$ such that $F(X)$ vanishes in $F_q$ Attempt I know that given $f$ then $f$ determines a unique splitting field, but I´m not sure if given a splitting if I…
Alan Jr
  • 165
1
vote
0 answers

Berlekamp Massey

I have a question regarding to the Berlekamp–Massey algorithm. Can someone guide me to understand the idea/intuition of this algorithm? According to the explanation in wikepedia(link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlekamp%E2%80%93Massey_algorithm),…
1
vote
2 answers

$\mathbb F_9 = \mathbb F_3(i)$ Question about squares

Is it true that $\forall a,b \in \mathbb F_9$: $a \cdot b$ is a square $\iff$ $a \cdot \overline b$ is a square ?
user42761
1
vote
1 answer

Field Trace Properties

Given a finite field $\mathbb{F}_{q}$ and $\mathbb{F}_{q^m}$ an extension, define the trace map as $$\text{Tr}_{\mathbb{F}_{q^m}/\mathbb{F}_{q}}(a):=\sum_{j=0}^{m-1}a^{q^j}.$$ I have managed to prove some properties of this map (like linearity), but…
defacto
  • 623
1
vote
2 answers

Property of finite division ring

If D is a finite division ring containing $q$ elements, then $a^q=a, > \forall a \in D$ ? I wish to know is that a valid claim? All i know is $D$ must be a finite field here, as it's a finite division ring. Also I know that every finite field…
S.S
  • 1,207
1
vote
3 answers

Finite field with real-like square root

In $\mathbb{R}$ for all $r$, $ x^2 = r $ or $ x^2 = -r $ has a solution. For which finite fields is this true? I.e. for which finite fields has a solution at least one of the equations $ x^2 = r $ or $ x^2 = -r $ for arbitrary $ r\in \mathbb{F} $…
1
vote
0 answers

Easy proof of the existence of a primitive element in a finite field

Is there an "easy" proof of the existence of a primitive element in a finite field? My book uses three lemmas and a theorem to get there, and I can't shake the feeling that there's an easier way of doing it. I've made some attempts using proof by…