Questions tagged [group-schemes]

Use this tag for scheme-theoretic and category-theoretic questions about group schemes, as well as those group schemes that are not algebraic groups. A group scheme G over a scheme S is simply a group object in the category of schemes over S. Finite type group schemes over a field are represented by varieties, and considered algebraic groups; for questions specific to algebraic groups use the [algebraic-groups] tag

A group scheme $G$ over a scheme $S$ is simply a group object in the category of schemes over $S$.

In other words, a group scheme consists of a scheme $G$ over $S$ and $3$ distinguished morphisms of $S$-schemes:

  • Multiplication $m \colon G \times G \to G$
  • Inverse $i \colon G \to G$
  • Identity $e \colon S \to G$

such that for all schemes $T$ over $S$, the morphisms $m$, $i$, and $e$ satisfy the axioms of a group structure on $G(T) = \mathrm{Hom}_S(T, G)$.

By transitivity of the group's action on itself, it must be either smooth or non-reduced everywhere. Thus all reduced group schemes $G$ of finite type over a field $k$ are smooth varieties, making them algebraic groups. Algebraic groups include linear algebraic groups, such as reductive groups and parabolic groups, as well as abelian varieties. Non-algebraic group schemes include non-smooth groups, such as the kernel of the Frobenius $F: \mathbb{G}_a(\mathbb{F}_p) \to \mathbb{G}_a(\mathbb{F}_p)$, as well as infinite-dimensional group schemes such as the positive loop group $L^+G$ of an affine group scheme. The category of affine group schemes is the opposite category of Hopf algebras.

213 questions
5
votes
1 answer

Equivalence definition of affine (group) schemes

I am currently studying affine group schemes via Waterhouse. Since Waterhouse does not use schematic language in the first few chapters, I tried to "translate" the definitions in different languages. I just wanted to make sure that I understood…
libofmath
  • 438
2
votes
1 answer

Are all finite schemes over a field flat?

If $f:X\to S$ is a morphism of schemes, and $S$ is locally Noetherian, then $f$ being finite and flat is equivalent to the sheaf $f_*\mathcal{O}_X$ being a finite locally free $\mathcal{O}_S$-module. (See…
user948537
1
vote
1 answer

Rational points of unipotent groups

Let $G$ be an unipotent group (smooth unipotent group scheme) of finite type over $F_q$ then why the set of his rational points over $F_q$ is a finite group?
1
vote
1 answer

Group schemes for beginners

Which book/notes would you advise for someone who knows (a little) scheme theory but not group scheme theory ? I am looking for some notes where everything is explained, and where there are lots of examples and corrected exercices.
bobito
  • 97
1
vote
1 answer

Dimension of algebraic group and morphism

Let $G$ and $G'$ be two affine connected algebraic groups. Let $f: G\rightarrow G'$ be an epimorphisme, etale and finite morphism of algebraic groups. Why do we have $dim(G)=dim(G')$?
bobito
  • 97
1
vote
0 answers

Naive question about quotient by a finite group scheme

Le $S$ be a base scheme, $G$ be a fnite $S$-group scheme that acts on a $S$-group scheme $X$ such that the quotient exists. I know that the dimension of $X/G$ has to be the dimension of $X$ because $G$ is finite but I don't succeed in proving it.…
Marianne
  • 51
  • 4
1
vote
0 answers

Group schemes over valuation rings

Let $S=\mathrm{Spec}(R)$ for a valuation ring $R$ and $G$ a group scheme over $S$. Is $G$ necessarily separated (maybe with some finiteness condition)?
0
votes
0 answers

Why is the Frobenius morphism for Witt rings epimorphism?

In Demazure's book ''lectures on $p$-divisible groups'' page 57, he said the Frobenius morphism $F:W_k\to W_k$ is given by $$F(a_0,\cdots, a_n,\cdots)=(a_0^p,\cdots,a_n^p,\cdots)$$ and in the proof of the proposition he said $F$ is an epimorphism.…
Phanpu
  • 31