Questions tagged [lambert-w]

For questions related to the Lambert W or product log function, the inverse of $f(z)=ze^z$.

Equations involving exponentials multiplied to linear terms, such as $x+2=e^x$, cannot be solved using elementary functions in general. However, they may be solved in closed form using the Lambert W function, the inverse of $f(z)=ze^z$. In the given example: $$x+2=e^x$$ $$(-x-2)e^{-x-2}=-e^{-2}$$ $$-x-2=W(-e^{-2})$$ $$x=-W(-e^{-2})-2$$ There are two real branches of the Lambert W: $$W_0(z)\text{ for }z\in[-1/e,\infty)$$ $$W_{-1}(z)\text{ for }z\in[-1/e,0)$$

There are also branches $W_n(z)$, with $n\in\mathbb{Z}$, which are defined only on the complex plane, but which still respect the property of solving $W_n(z)e^{W_n(z)}=z$.

The regions of the complex plane where the inverse relationship occurs are bounded by the curve $x=-y\cot(y)$.

As discussed in the Corless et al. reference, the use of $W$ follows early Maple usage. Exact solutions to some mathematical models in the natural sciences, such as Michaelis–Menten kinetics, use this function.

784 questions
3
votes
1 answer

Simplify $W(xa^x)$

I'm not sure if there is any way to simplify $W(xa^x)$. It's pretty clear that $a=e$ simplifies to $x$ or $W_k(xe^x)$, but any other value of $a$, other than trivial values like $a=0,1$, don't seem simplifyable. Here is a graph you may want to…
3
votes
1 answer

A problem in generalizing the Lambert's W function

The Lambert's Omega function has 2 real branches denoted by $W_{-1}(x)$ and $W_0(x)$ and it represents the solution(s) of the equation $xe^x=a$. I learned that this function can be generalized and for every $n\in \Bbb R$ so that $W_n(x)$ in the…
AlienRem
  • 4,011
3
votes
2 answers

Bound for function involving Lambert W

Given that $W(x)$ is the Lambert W function, how can one prove that $$(2+W(x))e^{-W(x)}\leq 2 \frac{\log^2 x}{x}, \quad x\geq e^2$$ Is it possible to generalize this and find a function $f(x)$ such that…
Jim
  • 59
3
votes
1 answer

Montonicity of Lambert W

Is Lambert $W(x)$ function, an increasing function from $0\rightarrow\infty$? How about in negative axis and complex plane? Note $W(x)$ is given by $$W(x)e^{W(x)}=x.$$ Charts could help understand.
Turbo
  • 6,221
2
votes
1 answer

How to use the Lambert W function instead of iterating

I am trying to calculate Id given the following equations: Vd = 5 - (Id * R) Id = Is * e^(Vd/.025) Is = 10^-15 R = 1000 By substitution: Id = 10^-15 * e^(40(5 - (Id * 1000))) Id = 10^-15 * e^200 * e^(-40 * Id * 1000) Id * e^(40 * Id * 1000) =…
Roland P
  • 123
2
votes
1 answer

Solution to equation (x^2)/a + ln(x) = b

Please kindly support me to calculate a solution to this equation step by step : $$\frac{x^2}a + ln(x) = b$$ x is the variable and a, b are constants. Unusually, I had to use WolframAlpha for the calculation. Not my style. The solution…
2
votes
1 answer

Can you use Lambert's W to solve this equation for x?

I would like to solve the following equation for $x$: $$ a= \left( \frac{x}{1-x} \right)^\lambda e^{bx} $$ I'm fairly new to using Lambert's W so I'm not sure if this is an appropriate tool for the problem.
2
votes
2 answers

Find the two solutions of $\log x=\frac{1}{2}(x-1)$

Question: solve $\log x=\frac{1}{2}(x-1)$ With the following I only get one solution (apparently with $W_0$), but I can't find the solution with $W_{-1}$ this way. What is my mistake? $$\log x=\frac{1}{2}(x-1)$$ $$\log…
2
votes
2 answers

How can I calculate $W(-x)$ using $W(x)$?

The question is with regards to Lambert W Function: Given $W(x)$, I need to calculate $W(-x)$. Is there any way to do that? I've searched through the function identities, but couldn't find anything useful. Thank you.
2
votes
5 answers

Find the real value(s) solution of the equation $3^x = 3(x+6)$

I tried using Lambert W function but I got stuck while trying to set the question in the form $xe^x =y$.
2
votes
0 answers

Inequality in formula solved with Lambert W

If I have an equation of the form $a = b \cdot e^b$ then the Lambert W function tells me that $W(a) = b$. But what if I instead have $a \geq b \cdot e^b$ ? Do I then have $W(a) \leq b$ or $W(a) \geq b$, or does it depend on the values of $a$ and…
AstridNeu
  • 43
  • 2
2
votes
2 answers

Having difficulty figuring out how to apply Lambert function

I was hoping someone can help me with the following. I had to solve the following ODE and get the implicit form. $$\frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{1+3y}{y} * x^2$$ this give by separating and integrating the following: $1/9*(3y-ln(3y+1))=1/3*x^3 +c $ which…
2
votes
2 answers

Solve for $x$ using the lambert W function $ \frac{\ln(1+bx)}{x} = a$

Question: Solve for $x$ using the lambert W function $$ \frac{\ln(1+bx)}{x} = a$$ I've got this far: $$ \frac{\ln(1+bx)}{x} = a$$ $$ \ln(1+bx) = ax $$ $$ 1+bx = e^{ax} $$ Stuck when to use the lambert W function
2
votes
1 answer

simplification of $W(x\cdot e^{a+x})$

Is it possible to simplify $W(x\cdot e^{a+x})$? Because $W(x\cdot e^{x})=x$ So I was wondering if it was possible to simplify this expression.
Idrees Samim
  • 121
  • 3
1
vote
2 answers

Solving an inequality with terms both within LambertW and outside of it.

$\newcommand{\LambertW}{\operatorname{LambertW}}$I am trying to solve the following inequality: $$100n^2<2^n, n\in\mathbb{R}$$ I have applied the following steps: \begin{align} & \frac{n^2}{2^n} < \frac{1}{100} \\ \Rightarrow {} & n^2 \cdot…
user132716