Questions tagged [semi-riemannian-geometry]

It is the study of smooth manifolds equipped with a non-degenerate metric tensor, not necessarily positive-definite (and hence a generalisation of [riemannian-geometry]). Included in this are metric tensors with index 1, called "Lorentzian", which are used to model spacetimes in (general-relativity).

A semi-Riemannian manifold is a pair $(M,g)$ where $M$ is a smooth manifold and $g$ a section (usually assumed smooth, but continuous or perhaps even lower regularity are sometimes considered) of $T^{0,2}M$ (in other words, $g$ is a covariant two-tensor field), such that $g$ satisfies the conditions:

  1. $g(X,Y) = g(Y,X)$ for any vector fields $X,Y$. (Symmetric)
  2. $g(X,\cdot)$, as a one-form, is the zero-one form if and only if $X$ is the zero vector. (Non-degenerate)

If in addition $g(X,X) > 0$ when $X \neq 0$, we say that the geometry is Riemannian.

While much of the algebraic theory of Riemannian geometry (by which I mean the curvature identities, Gauss-Codazzi equations, and other statements that are obtained by purely algebraic manipulations of the definitions) can be reproduced identically for semi-Riemannian geometry, there are crucial differences. For example, the theorem of Hopf-Rinow on geodesic completeness is no longer true. (Roughly speaking, the reason is that in the proof of Hopf-Rinow it is used the fact that in Riemannian geometry, the set of vectors $g(X,X) = 1$ is topologically a sphere, and is compact. In semi-Riemannian geometry, the corresponding set can be non-compact.)

Much of the study of semi-Riemannian geometry focuses on clarifying which statements of Riemannian geometry have appropriate analogues.

Now, since $g$ is continuous, from Sylvester's law of inertia we have that the metric signature of $g$ is constant on every connected component of $M$. The case where the signature is (-++...+) deserves special mention, as this is the setting in which one studies . This case is often called Lorentzian geometry.

In the Lorentzian case we have some more tools available to us compared to the general semi-Riemannian manifolds. The most important difference being that the set $\{g(X,X) < 0\}$ in $T_pM$ has two connected components. In more general semi-Riemannian settings the analogue set is connected. This property allows us to locally determine a notion of future and past, which leads to the development of causal geometry, which carries a fundamental role in the study of mathematical relativity.

431 questions
3
votes
0 answers

Invariance of signature in semi-riemannian manifolds

The signature of a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear map $h:V\times V\to \mathbb{R}$ in a vector space $V$ is the number of negative numbers on the diagonal of the matrix $h_{ij} = h(e_i,e_j)$ when it's diagonalized. Sylvester's Law of Inertia…
3
votes
0 answers

Example of a connected semi-Riemannian manifold

Give an example of a connected semi-Riemannian manifold that is complete at one point but not complete.
2
votes
1 answer

spacelike curves, in lorentzian geometry?

i have this question : Let $(M,g)$ be a lorentzian manifold, and $\gamma:[0,1]\rightarrow M$ be a spacelike curve in $M$, between two different point $A$ and $B$, so : can: $\underset{\gamma}{inf}\int_0^1\sqrt{g(\gamma'(t),\gamma'(t))}dt$ be zero…
kamerove
  • 175
2
votes
0 answers

Is there a natural choice of cone in Minkowski space as a real affine space?

Minkowski space is a homogeneous affine real space and under this translationally invariant perspective that doesn't have privileged points it seems easier to consider its one-sheet 3-hyperboloid hypersurface description over the two-sheet one and…
bonif
  • 293
  • 2
  • 11
1
vote
0 answers

Partial derivative in O'Neill's book

May be this is a stupid question but... in Definition $10$ of O'Neill's book Semi-Riemannian Geometry With Applications to Relativity, it is stated that the partial derivative of a function $f\in \mathfrak{F}(M)$ with respect to the coordinate $x^i$…
1
vote
1 answer

Index (or signature) of a pseudo-riemannian metric on manifold

Let $(M , g)$ a $n$-dimensional pseudo-riemannian manifold. As $g(p)$ is a bilinear mapping from $T_pM \times T_pM$ to $\mathbb{R}$, we can get a basis $$ {\left\{{\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}\right)}_p\right\}}_{i = 1}^n $$ on $T_pM$ such…
joseabp91
  • 2,360
1
vote
1 answer

The projection from the time-orientable double cover preserves topological properties.

In Relativity and Singularities, Natário states that A connected time-orientable Lorentzian manifold admits a nonvanishing vector field, and hence is either noncompact or has zero Euler characteristic. The same is true for a…
1
vote
2 answers

Lorentzian scalar product

Let $X$ be a future-directed vector and $Y$ a past-directed one in a time-oriented space-time (manifold). We want to compute $g(X,Y)$. I choose a coordinate in which $X=X^0\partial_0$ with $X^0>0$ since $X$ is future-directed and the space-time is…
user344662
1
vote
0 answers

A General Question on Semi-Riemannian Geometry and Finsler Geometry

I’m a first-year graduate math student on my way to earn my master's. I like geometry and topology and our faculty has two geometers and hence I have two options for the thesis. First is walker manifolds and semi-Riemannian geometry and second,…
Behrooz
  • 1,000
1
vote
1 answer

The null cone is not a proper subspace

I'm stuck on an exercise in Barret O'Neill's book on Semi-Riemannian Geometry(ex. 12 ch. 2). "Let b be a symmetric bilinear form on V.[...] The null cone of b is the set $\Lambda$ of all null vectors in V. Let $A = \Lambda \cup 0 $, so $A \supset…
LLuu
  • 107
0
votes
1 answer

Integrals over a space with Lorentz signature metric

$$\int_{spacetime}\frac{d^4x}{(x^2)^2}=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dt\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dy\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dz\frac{1}{(t^2-x^2-y^2-z^2)^2}$$ To show that $\int_{spacetime}\frac{d^4x}{(x^2)^2}$ diverges in physics we…
0
votes
0 answers

Proving that $\langle X,V\rangle=\langle Y,V\rangle$ for all vectors $V\in T_pM$ $\implies$ $X=Y$

I'm trying to prove the following statement: Let $(M,g)$ be a semi-Riemannian manifold. For $X,Y\in T_pM$, prove that if $\langle X,V\rangle=\langle Y,V\rangle$ for all vectors $V\in T_pM$, then $X=Y$. My approach is the following: We know that…