Questions tagged [vector-analysis]

Questions related to understanding line integrals, vector fields, surface integrals, the theorems of Gauss, Green and Stokes. Some related tags are (multivariable-calculus) and (differential-geometry).

Vector analysis, a branch of mathematics that deals with quantities that have both magnitude and direction.

Some physical quantities like the mass or the temperature at some point only have magnitude. We can represent these quantities by number alone (with the appropriate units) and so we call them scalars. There are other physical quantities that have magnitude and direction, called vector. Their magnitude can stretch or shrink, and their direction can reverse. These quantities can be added in such a way that takes into account both direction and magnitude.

Force is an example of a quantity that acts in a certain direction with some magnitude that we measure in Newtons. When two forces act on an object, the sum of the forces depends on both the direction and magnitude of either one. Position, displacement, velocity, acceleration, force, momentum, and torque are all physical quantities that can be mathematically represented by vectors.

One of the most difficult problems in understanding physics is learning how to represent these physical quantities as mathematical vectors.

Vector calculus was developed from quaternion analysis by J. Willard Gibbs and Oliver Heaviside near the end of the $~19{th}~$ century, and most of the notation and terminology was established by Gibbs and Edwin Bidwell Wilson in their $~1901~$ book, Vector Analysis.

In the conventional form using cross products, vector calculus does not generalize to higher dimensions, while the alternative approach of geometric algebra, which uses exterior products does generalize, as discussed below.

Applications:

When we apply vectors to physical quantities it’s nice to keep in the back of our minds all these formal properties. However from the physicist’s point of view, we are interested in representing physical quantities like displacement, velocity, acceleration, force, impulse, momentum, torque, and angular momentum as vectors. We can’t add force to velocity or subtract momentum from torque. We must always understand the physical context for the vector quantity. So instead of approaching vectors as formal mathematical objects we shall instead consider the following essential properties that enable us to represent physical quantities as vectors.

References:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_calculus

http://web.mit.edu/8.01t/www/materials/modules/ReviewA.pdf

6580 questions
23
votes
3 answers

Vector Calculus Identities Using Differential Forms

Is there a nice way to derive $$ \nabla (\vec{F} \cdot \vec{G}) = \vec{F} \times (\nabla \times \vec{G} ) + \vec{G} \times (\nabla \times \vec{F}) + (\vec{F} \cdot \nabla ) \vec{G} + (\vec{G} \cdot \nabla ) \vec{F} $$ & $$ \nabla \times (\vec{F}…
bolbteppa
  • 4,389
17
votes
3 answers

Does taking $\nabla\times$ infinity times from an arbitrary vector exists?

Is it possible to get the value of: \begin{equation} \underbrace{\left[\nabla\times\left[\nabla\times\left[\ldots\nabla\times\right.\right.\right.}_{\infty\text{-times taking curl operator}}\mathbf{V}\left.\left.\left.\right]\right]\ldots\right] =…
m0nhawk
  • 1,779
14
votes
1 answer

Closed surface integral of the surface's normal vector

Is it true that the surface integral over any closed surface (we are in $\mathbb R^3$) of the normal vector $\hat n$ of that surface, say $\hat n$ is pointing outward, is zero? In other words, is it true that $$\iint_S \hat n \ dS = 0$$ for any…
12
votes
5 answers

Why does $\oint\mathbf{E}\cdot{d}\boldsymbol\ell=0$ imply $\nabla\times\mathbf{E}=\mathbf{0}$?

I am looking at Griffith's Electrodynamics textbook and on page 76 he is discussing the curl of electric field in electrostatics. He claims that since $$\oint_C\mathbf{E}\cdot{d}\boldsymbol\ell=0$$ then $$\nabla\times\mathbf{E}=\mathbf{0}$$ I don't…
11
votes
3 answers

Divergence of matrix-vector product

Suppose that $A$ is a matrix field and that $v$ is a vector field. What is the divergence of the matrix-vector product $A \cdot v$, which is a vector field?
shuhalo
  • 7,485
10
votes
3 answers

How is "area" a vector?

"We consider Area as a vector." How is an area a vector? Why is that the vector is always normal to the area element?
Inquisitive
  • 798
  • 2
  • 7
  • 23
9
votes
2 answers

Is the Laplacian a vector or a scalar?

Need to prove $\operatorname{div}(\nabla u)=\nabla ^2 u$ where $u=g(x,y,z)$ The RHS is the Lapacian which we were told is a vector. But $\nabla u=(g_x,g_y,g_z)$ and the divergence of that is $g_{xx}+g_{yy}+g_{zz}$ which is not a vector. I don't get…
snowman
  • 3,733
  • 8
  • 42
  • 73
7
votes
1 answer

Integration by parts, gardient & laplacian

I saw the following statement: If D is a geometric manifold without boundary in $R^{d}$, then $ \int_{D} \nabla (f) . \nabla(g) \mathrm{d}x= - \int_{D} f . \Delta(g) \mathrm{d}x$ for $f, g \in H(D) $. Obviously an integration by parts is going on…
daria
  • 81
7
votes
2 answers

Fourier transform of gradient

I encountered in a physics book the Fourier transform $F$ of the gradient of a function $g$ smooth with compact support on $\mathbb R^3$. Up to some multiplicative constants: $F(\nabla g)(k)=k.F(g)(k) $ The book claims that this is proved by…
Tom
  • 1,125
7
votes
4 answers

Proof of vector calculus identities

Here is the all identities : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_calculus_identities I need help concerning vector functions and indexing notations. Let $\overrightarrow{a}$ be a (smooth) vector field and $\varphi$ be a (smooth) scalar function.…
7
votes
1 answer

What is a conservative field?

My understanding of the conservative field is that it is any vector field that satisfies any of these three equivalent conditions: $$\oint_C\vec{F}.d\vec{s}=0$$for any closed path $C$ in the domain,$$\vec{F}=\vec{\nabla}\phi$$for some scalar field…
Tofi
  • 277
7
votes
1 answer

the gradient of the product of a scalar by a vector

We know from the tensor calculus that: $\vec\nabla (a\cdot b) = b\vec\nabla a + a \vec\nabla b$ , where $a$ and $b$ are two scalar functions. But in the case where for example $a$ is a scalar function and $b$ is a vector how to develop that…
7
votes
1 answer

basic question from vector analysis

Let $\vec v = (a,b,c)$ be a constant vector and let $\vec r = (x,y,z)$ denote the position vector. Consider the vector field $\vec v \times \vec r$. A straightforward calculation (using determinants or a vector identity) shows that $\nabla \times…
user2052
  • 2,427
6
votes
4 answers

If a vector field is divergenceless and curless, is that vector field = 0?

Just a simple question, from the title of the thread, is a vector field = 0 if the divergence is 0 and the curl is 0? I had trouble finding an answer anywhere online, proof of why or why not would be helpful, thanks! $$\nabla \cdot \vec{F} =…
6
votes
2 answers

How to separate the square of a vector dot product into a product of functions of individual vectors?

I have the following function of two arbitrary vectors $X$ and $M$ $$f(X,M) = (M^{T} \cdot X)^2 = M^{T} \cdot X \cdot X^{T} \cdot M$$ Can I express the function as $f(X,M) = g(X) \cdot h(M)$ ?? If yes, then what will be $g(X)$ and $h(M$)?
user17320
  • 191
1
2 3
43 44