I was reading chapter 1 of the book on functional equation by Titu Anderescu.
I encountered two of the following theorems.
Theorem 1.1. Let $ f : \mathbb R \to \mathbb R $ be an additive function. Then the following four conditions are equivalent:
(i) $ f $ has the form $ f ( x ) = a x $ for some $ a \in \mathbb R $;
(ii) $ f $ is bounded above (below) on an interval;
(iii) $ f $ is increasing (decreasing) on an interval;
(iv) $ f $ is continuous at a point.
Theorem 1.6. Any solution $ f : ( 0 , \infty ) \to \mathbb R $ of the logarithmic Cauchy equation has the form of $ f ( x ) = g ( \ln x ) $, where $ g : \mathbb R \to \mathbb R $ is an additive function.
Then we have the following corollary.
An immediate consequence of Theorems 1.1 and 1.6 is the following characterization of the logarithmic function:
Corollary 1.2. Let $ f : ( 0 , \infty ) \to \mathbb R $ be a solution of the logarithmic Cauchy equation having one of the following properties:
(i) $ f $ is bounded above (below) on an interval;
(ii) $ f $ is increasing (decreasing) on an interval;
(iii) $ f $ is continuous at a point. Then $ f ( x ) = a \lg x $, where $ a \in \mathbb R $.
I am unable to prove Corollary 1.2 and I am also not able to understand that why $ f : ( 0 , \infty ) \to \mathbb R $ (instead of $ g : \mathbb R \to \mathbb R $) has to have any one of the three conditions.
A detailed proof for the same would be highly helpful and will be appreciated.