4

Question

I am self-studying signal processing and ran into the following double integral:

$$\int_{-T/2}^{T/2}\int_{-T/2}^{T/2}g(\alpha-\beta)d\alpha d\beta$$

The YouTube video I am watching says this integral can be converted to a single integral using variable substitution with $\tau=\alpha-\beta$.

$$ \int_{-T/2}^{T/2}\int_{-T/2}^{T/2}g(\alpha-\beta)d\alpha d\beta=T\int_{-T}^T g(\tau)\left(1-\frac{|\tau|}{T}\right)d\tau $$

but I'm having trouble proving it.

Attempt

Following this question, I tried variable substitution with $\tau=\alpha-\beta$ and $\phi=\alpha+\beta$. Then \begin{align*} \alpha&=\tau+\beta\\ \beta&=\alpha-\tau\\ \alpha&=\phi-\beta\\ \beta&=\phi-\alpha \end{align*}

so the Jacobian is $$ \frac{\partial (\alpha,\beta)}{\partial (\tau,\phi)}= \left|\begin{matrix} 1 & -1\\ 1 & 1 \end{matrix}\right|=2 $$

If I'm doing this correctly, the new integral would be

$$ \int_{-T}^{T}\int_{-T}^{T}g(\tau)(2)d\tau d\phi $$

But this doesn't seem to be correct. What is the best way to approach this integral?

nwsteg
  • 329

3 Answers3

2

This is a great approach. One mistake is in computing the Jacobian: the original variables $\alpha$ and $\beta$ must be written entirely in terms of the new variables $\tau$ and $\phi$ rather than depending on each other. You should find that $\alpha=\frac12(\phi+\tau)$ and $\beta=\frac12(\phi-\tau)$.

The other mistake lies in the endpoints of integration. In any double integral, the outer endpoints denote all possible values of the outer variable ($\phi$ in this case); the inner endpoints denote, for any fixed value of the outer variable ($\phi$), all possible corresponding values of the inner variable ($\tau$ in this case).

In the original integral, the outer variable $\beta$ can take any value between $-\frac T2$ and $\frac T2$; and then the inner variable $\alpha$ can also take any value between $-\frac T2$ and $\frac T2$, independently of the value of the outer variable $\beta$. This independence (which manifests in the fact that $\beta$ does not appear in the expressions for the inner endpoints) reflects the fact that the region of integration is a rectangle with sides parallel to the axes. But that shape, and hence that independence, will not survive most changes of variables.

In the new integral, you're right that $\phi$ can take any value between $-T$ and $T$. But the corresponding values of $\tau$ depend upon the value of $\phi$. (For example, if $\phi=T$, what could $\tau$ possibly be?) That dependance must be reflected in the endpoints of the inner integral.

The new integral can be either $\displaystyle\frac12\int_{-T}^{T}\int_{|\phi|-T}^{T-|\phi|}g(\tau) \,d\tau \,d\phi$ or, if you make the other choice about which is the inner and outer variable, $\displaystyle\frac12\int_{-T}^{T}\int_{|\tau|-T}^{T-|\tau|}g(\tau) \,d\phi \,d\tau$. I encourage you to use this latter form to complete the calculation into the answer you expect.

But, most importantly, I encourage you to really understand how changes of variables affect the endpoints of a multiple integral. This is a common tripping point for people learning multivariable calculus, but it's absolutely crucial to master this detail, because without it virtually every change of variables will yield the wrong answer.

Greg Martin
  • 78,820
  • Thanks for your detailed advice. I've been reading this website which explains the transformation, Jacobian, and limits of integration in detail. I chose another answer for concision but I really appreciate how you explained all my mistakes. – nwsteg Jul 31 '22 at 23:59
2

With $\tau=\alpha -\beta $, rewrite the integral as \begin{align} I=\int_{-T/2}^{T/2}\int_{-T/2}^{T/2}g(\alpha-\beta)\ d\alpha d\beta = &\int_{-T/2}^{T/2}\bigg(\int_{-T/2-\beta}^{T/2-\beta}g(\tau)\ d\tau \bigg)d\beta\\ \end{align} Then, integrate $\beta$ by parts \begin{align} I= & \ \beta \int_{-T/2-\beta}^{T/2-\beta}g(\tau)\ d\tau \bigg|_{-T/2}^{T/2} - \int_{-T/2}^{T/2}\beta \ \bigg(\frac d{d\beta}\int_{-T/2-\beta}^{T/2-\beta}g(\tau)\ d\tau \bigg)d\beta\\ = & \ \frac T2\int_{-T}^{T}g(\tau)\ d\tau +\int_{-T/2}^{T/2}\beta \ g(\overset{\tau = T/2-\beta}{T/2-\beta})\ d\beta-\int_{-T/2}^{T/2}\ \beta \ g(\overset{\tau = -T/2-\beta}{-T/2-\beta}))\ d\beta\\ = & \int_{-T}^{T}Tg(\tau)d\tau -\int_0^T \tau g(\tau)d\tau+\int_{-T}^0 \tau g(\tau)d\tau\\ =& \int_{-T}^T (T-|\tau|)g(\tau)d\tau \end{align}

Quanto
  • 97,352
1

$\alpha = \frac{\phi + \tau}{2}$ and $\beta = \frac{\phi - \tau}{2}$

So $$\frac{\mathrm d \left(\alpha, \beta\right)}{\mathrm d \left(\phi, \tau\right)} = \left|\begin{matrix}\frac12 & \frac12\\ -\frac12 & \frac12\end{matrix}\right| = \frac12$$

However since, $$\phi = \tau + 2\beta,$$ then $$\tau-T\le \phi \le \tau+T.$$

and $$\phi = 2\alpha - \tau,$$ then $$-\tau-T\le \phi \le -\tau+T.$$

\begin{align} \int_{-\frac T2}^{\frac T2}\int_{-\frac T2}^{\frac T2} g\left(\alpha - \beta\right)\mathrm d \alpha \mathrm d \beta &= \int_{-T}^{T} \int_{-T}^{T} g(\tau)\mathbf 1_{\tau - T\le \phi\le \tau + T} \mathbf 1_{-\tau-T\le \phi \le -\tau+T}\times \frac12 \mathrm d \phi \mathrm d \tau\\ &= \frac12\int_{-T}^{T} g(\tau) \left(\int_{-T}^{T} \mathbf 1_{\tau - T\le \phi\le \tau + T}\mathbf 1_{-\tau-T\le \phi \le -\tau+T}\mathrm d \phi\right)\mathrm d \tau\\ &= \frac12\int_{-T}^0 g(\tau)\left(\int_{-\tau-T}^{\tau + T} \mathrm d\phi\right)\mathrm d \tau + \frac12\int_{0}^T g(\tau)\left(\int_{\tau-T}^{-\tau+T} \mathrm d\phi\right)\mathrm d \tau\\ &= \frac12\int_{-T}^0 g(\tau)\left(2\tau + 2T\right)\mathrm d \tau + \frac12\int_{0}^T g(\tau)\left(2T-2\tau\right)\mathrm d \tau\\ &= \frac12\int_{-T}^0 g(\tau)\left(2T-2\left|\tau\right|\right)\mathrm d \tau + \frac12\int_{0}^T g(\tau)\left(2T-2\left|\tau\right|\right)\mathrm d \tau\\ &= \frac12\int_{-T}^T g(\tau)\left(2T-2\left|\tau\right|\right)\mathrm d \tau\\ &= \frac12 \times 2T\int_{-T}^T g(\tau)\left(1-\frac{\left|\tau\right|}{T}\right)\mathrm d \tau\\ &= T\int_{-T}^T g(\tau)\left(1-\frac{\left|\tau\right|}{T}\right)\mathrm d \tau \end{align}

Kroki
  • 13,135