Questions tagged [dynamical-systems]

In dynamical systems, the motion of a particle in some geometric space, governed by some time dependent rules, is studied. The process can be discrete (where the particle jumps from point to point) or continuous (where the particle follows a trajectory). Dynamical systems is used in mathematical models of diverse fields such as classical mechanics, economics, traffic modelling, population dynamics, and biological feedback.

A dynamical system is, very broadly, a system which changes in time according to some rules. One concrete example of a dynamical system is the following.

Example 1: A billiard ball moving on a frictionless billiards table. In this example, what is changing in time is the position of the ball. There are two rules governing this motion, namely that the ball will travel at the same speed for all time, and that the ball will bank off a rail at the same angle that it hit the rail.

Given an initial position and velocity for the ball, these two rules enable one to compute the trajectory of the ball for all time. This illustrates an important property of dynamical systems: they are deterministic. The rules governing the dynamical system should, at least in theory, allow one to determine the state of the system at every point in the future, given some initial data. Another, more abstract, example of a dynamical system is

Example 2: A function $f\colon X\to X$, where $X$ is a set. In this example, one thinks of $X$ as a space in which a particle is moving, and $f$ as a rule governing the motion of the particle. Explicitly, if the particle is at the point $x_0\in X$ at time $t = 0$, then at time $t = 1$ it is at the point $x_1:= f(x_0)$, and at time $t = 2$ it is at the point $x_2 := f(x_1)$, etc.

Given the initial position $x_0$ of the particle, its position at time $t = n$ is therefore $f^{\circ n}(x_0)$, where $f^{\circ n}$ denotes the composition of $f$ with itself $n$ times. In this example, studying the dynamical system is equivalent to studying the iterates of $f$

Notice that in example 1 the position of the ball is defined for every time $t>0$, whereas in example 2 the position of the particle is only defined at positive integer values of time. Example 1 is called a continuous time dynamical system, and example 2 is called a discrete time dynamical system. These are the most commonly studied dynamical systems.

In both continuous and discrete time dynamical systems, the most commonly asked questions are the following:

  1. What is the trajectory of the system given specified initial conditions? While these trajectories can be computed in theory, in practice they are often difficult to impossible to compute.
  2. What is the long term behavior of the system? What happens after a long time, i.e., as $t\to\infty$?
  3. Are there any initial conditions which lead to "special" trajectories? For instance, in example 1, if the ball is hit from the center of the table along a line perpendicular to a rail, then its trajectory will be periodic, that is, it will repeat itself forever.

Continuous time dynamical systems

The most classical examples of dynamical systems are continuous time dynamical systems coming from physics. The motion of a particle moving in space under some force is a standard system; the rules governing the system in this situation are Newton's laws of motion. Another common systems are the diffusion of heat through a material, which is determined by the heat equation, or the motion of particles in a fluid, which is determined by a flow.

In each of these, as in most continuous time dynamical systems, the rules governing the system are a system of differential equations. Because of this, there is a great deal of overlap between the study dynamical systems and differential equations. Questions about the asymptotic behavior of solutions of differential equations very often fall under the heading of dynamical systems.

Discrete time dynamical systems

A discrete time dynamical system is given by a function $f\colon X\to X$, where $X$ is a set. In this generality, such a system is hard to study. Usually one imposes more structure:

  • If $X$ is a topological space and $f$ is continuous, it is called a topological dynamical system.
  • If $X$ is a manifold and $f$ is smooth, is it called a smooth dynamical system.
  • If $X$ is a complex manifold and $f$ is holomorphic, it is called a complex dynamical system.
  • If $X$ is a measure space and $f$ is measurable, it is called a measurable dynamical system.

Each of these types of dynamical systems has a rich theory behind it.

Chaos and ergodic theory

The most interesting dynamical systems are those that exhibit chaotic behavior. For instance, in example 1, suppose one hits the ball from the center of the table in a certain direction, and on another table one hits the ball from the center of the table in a slightly different direction. Then, after a long period of time, the trajectories of the two balls will diverge and be very different. Thus a slight change in initial conditions (direction the ball is hit) results in very different behavior of the two systems. Such extreme sensitivity to initial conditions is referred to as chaotic behavior.

Systems which exhibit chaotic behavior, while interesting, are often more difficult to study. A common method for approaching such systems is to use statistical and probabilistic methods. In example 1, for instance, instead of asking where the ball is at some very large time $t$ (which could be difficult to compute), one could ask where the ball is most likely to be at time $t$. Such questions are usually easier to approach, and fall under the heading of ergodic theory.

7122 questions
0
votes
0 answers

Doubts on dynamical systems concepts

I've been looking for explanations and examples of these concepts on internet, but I'm not finding anything that makes me truly understand this... The concepts are: fixed point vs periodic point periodic point vs periodic point of period $k$ orbit…
0
votes
1 answer

Sketch the graph of the solution with various initial conditions.

Consider the following one-dimensional system $$\frac{dx}{dt}=x^2-1.$$ Then, using the phase portrait, sketch the graph of the solution $x(t)$ for various initial conditions. I just wanted to confirm whether this means to solve for $x$ using…
thesmallprint
  • 3,636
  • 1
  • 16
  • 25
0
votes
1 answer

Understanding hyperbolic dynamical systems

I am trying to understand uniformly hyperbolic dynamical systems from the definition given here. I understand Smale's horseshoe with expansion and contraction that is very clear to see, but I don't see how the derivative gives us this expansion and…
Dan M
  • 43
  • 4
0
votes
1 answer

showing system is topologically transitive

Suppose $(X,f)$ is a dynamical system which consists of a discrete space $X$ with $|X| \geq 2$ and consisting of a single periodic orbit. I need to show that $(X,f)$ is topologically transitive. Is this obvious? If $(X,f)$ consists of a single…
0
votes
1 answer

Local asymptotically stability at a non derivable equilibrium point

Given $\alpha , \beta > 0$ we define $$f(x)= \begin{cases} \alpha x & x \geq 0 \\ -\beta x & x <0 \\ \end{cases}$$ It´s obvious that $p=0$ is a fixed point of the system $x_{n+1}=f(x_n)$, I´m having problems…
Tt Nach00
  • 69
  • 6
0
votes
0 answers

How to classify an equilibrium point of a nonlinear system that has a zero eigenvalue

Just wondering how you're supposed to classify an equilibrium point if one of the eigenvalues is zero and the other is a negative real number. The linearisation theorem fails here and I don't know how to classify the point otherwise. The only other…
Anon
  • 49
0
votes
1 answer

Contraction Theorem & Measure Zero

It is well known that if we have an interval map $f:I\rightarrow I$ with $f'(x)<1$ for all $x\in I$, then $f$ is a contraction. I want to understand the "limits" of this lemma. Say on a set of measure zero $f'(x)=1$, will the result still hold? I…
Karambwan
  • 689
0
votes
1 answer

Manifolds of a periodic orbit

Are there stable and or unstable manifolds transverse to a periodic orbit. I know there are stable and unstable manifold tangent to the eigenvectors of a fixed point.
0
votes
1 answer

For an ergodic Invariant measure $\mu$, if a set $B$ has measure 0 can we imply $\mu(f^{-1}(B)) =0$?

We state $\mu$ is an ergodic invariant measure for $f$. We know that if a set, $A$ is invariant with respect to $f$ then $\mu(A) \in \{0,1\}$. According to some lecture notes, we do not know set $B$ is invariant with respect to $f$ and that…
JLD
  • 55
0
votes
1 answer

Comparison function for the Rossler system

we are studying the chaotic Rössler system: $$ \begin{align} & \dot{x}_1 = - x_2 - x_3\\ & \dot{x}_2 = x_1 +\alpha x_2\\ & \dot{x}_3 = \beta + x_3(x_1-\gamma) \end{align} $$ With $\alpha = \beta = 0.1$ and $\gamma = 14$, and $x_3(0)>0$, such that…
L C
  • 1
0
votes
1 answer

Lorenz Equations, embedding and Takens’ theorem

Show that observation of $z$ component alone of the Lorenz equations \begin{align} \dot x& = \sigma (y-x)\\ \dot y &= x (\rho -z) -y\\ \dot z &= xy-\beta z \end{align} does not lead to an embedding. Why does this not violating Takens' Theorem? What…
user628973
0
votes
1 answer

Can the dynamical system $f(x)=2x \mod 1$, for $x \in [0, 1]$, be restricted to give a minimal system?

Say I have the dynamical system given by $f(x)=2x \mod 1$ For $x \in (I=[0, 1], \text{Euclidean metric})$. $f$ as defined is not minimal (because it has periodic points). That is not all the orbits of $f$ are dense. My question is does…
pops
  • 145
0
votes
1 answer

Example of a simple dynamical system with no equicontinuity points but not sensitive

I am looking for an example of a simple discrete dynamical system with no equicontinuity points but not sensitive. Found this example in the book of Kurka. But could not really understand it. $X=\left\{ \left( x,y,z\right) \in…
kiki
  • 11
0
votes
2 answers

Find exact solution for $x_{n+1}$ = $4x_n(1-x_n)$ by setting $x_n =\sin^{2}\theta_n$ and then simplify

I am trying to solve the following problem however I am stuck. I tried to apply trigonometric identity but I am not finding anything useful.
Kbiir
  • 325
  • 5
  • 13
0
votes
2 answers

why is it not possible to have a period-2 orbit(or greater) for a 2D autonomous system?

Why is it not possible to have a period-2 orbit(or greater) for a 2D autonomous system whereas the same is possible for a non-autonomous system? I can explain the existence of period-2 orbits in non-autonomous systems by saying that the forcing…