Questions tagged [dynamical-systems]

In dynamical systems, the motion of a particle in some geometric space, governed by some time dependent rules, is studied. The process can be discrete (where the particle jumps from point to point) or continuous (where the particle follows a trajectory). Dynamical systems is used in mathematical models of diverse fields such as classical mechanics, economics, traffic modelling, population dynamics, and biological feedback.

A dynamical system is, very broadly, a system which changes in time according to some rules. One concrete example of a dynamical system is the following.

Example 1: A billiard ball moving on a frictionless billiards table. In this example, what is changing in time is the position of the ball. There are two rules governing this motion, namely that the ball will travel at the same speed for all time, and that the ball will bank off a rail at the same angle that it hit the rail.

Given an initial position and velocity for the ball, these two rules enable one to compute the trajectory of the ball for all time. This illustrates an important property of dynamical systems: they are deterministic. The rules governing the dynamical system should, at least in theory, allow one to determine the state of the system at every point in the future, given some initial data. Another, more abstract, example of a dynamical system is

Example 2: A function $f\colon X\to X$, where $X$ is a set. In this example, one thinks of $X$ as a space in which a particle is moving, and $f$ as a rule governing the motion of the particle. Explicitly, if the particle is at the point $x_0\in X$ at time $t = 0$, then at time $t = 1$ it is at the point $x_1:= f(x_0)$, and at time $t = 2$ it is at the point $x_2 := f(x_1)$, etc.

Given the initial position $x_0$ of the particle, its position at time $t = n$ is therefore $f^{\circ n}(x_0)$, where $f^{\circ n}$ denotes the composition of $f$ with itself $n$ times. In this example, studying the dynamical system is equivalent to studying the iterates of $f$

Notice that in example 1 the position of the ball is defined for every time $t>0$, whereas in example 2 the position of the particle is only defined at positive integer values of time. Example 1 is called a continuous time dynamical system, and example 2 is called a discrete time dynamical system. These are the most commonly studied dynamical systems.

In both continuous and discrete time dynamical systems, the most commonly asked questions are the following:

  1. What is the trajectory of the system given specified initial conditions? While these trajectories can be computed in theory, in practice they are often difficult to impossible to compute.
  2. What is the long term behavior of the system? What happens after a long time, i.e., as $t\to\infty$?
  3. Are there any initial conditions which lead to "special" trajectories? For instance, in example 1, if the ball is hit from the center of the table along a line perpendicular to a rail, then its trajectory will be periodic, that is, it will repeat itself forever.

Continuous time dynamical systems

The most classical examples of dynamical systems are continuous time dynamical systems coming from physics. The motion of a particle moving in space under some force is a standard system; the rules governing the system in this situation are Newton's laws of motion. Another common systems are the diffusion of heat through a material, which is determined by the heat equation, or the motion of particles in a fluid, which is determined by a flow.

In each of these, as in most continuous time dynamical systems, the rules governing the system are a system of differential equations. Because of this, there is a great deal of overlap between the study dynamical systems and differential equations. Questions about the asymptotic behavior of solutions of differential equations very often fall under the heading of dynamical systems.

Discrete time dynamical systems

A discrete time dynamical system is given by a function $f\colon X\to X$, where $X$ is a set. In this generality, such a system is hard to study. Usually one imposes more structure:

  • If $X$ is a topological space and $f$ is continuous, it is called a topological dynamical system.
  • If $X$ is a manifold and $f$ is smooth, is it called a smooth dynamical system.
  • If $X$ is a complex manifold and $f$ is holomorphic, it is called a complex dynamical system.
  • If $X$ is a measure space and $f$ is measurable, it is called a measurable dynamical system.

Each of these types of dynamical systems has a rich theory behind it.

Chaos and ergodic theory

The most interesting dynamical systems are those that exhibit chaotic behavior. For instance, in example 1, suppose one hits the ball from the center of the table in a certain direction, and on another table one hits the ball from the center of the table in a slightly different direction. Then, after a long period of time, the trajectories of the two balls will diverge and be very different. Thus a slight change in initial conditions (direction the ball is hit) results in very different behavior of the two systems. Such extreme sensitivity to initial conditions is referred to as chaotic behavior.

Systems which exhibit chaotic behavior, while interesting, are often more difficult to study. A common method for approaching such systems is to use statistical and probabilistic methods. In example 1, for instance, instead of asking where the ball is at some very large time $t$ (which could be difficult to compute), one could ask where the ball is most likely to be at time $t$. Such questions are usually easier to approach, and fall under the heading of ergodic theory.

7122 questions
0
votes
1 answer

An isometry does not have the pseudo-orbit tracing property.

Let $X$ be a metric space with metric $d$ and let $f:X\rightarrow X$ be dynamical system. We say a sequence $\{y_i\} \subset X$ is a $\delta$-pseudo-orbit of $f$ if $d(f(y_k),y_{k+1}) < \delta,$ for each $k\in \mathbb{Z}$. Let $\epsilon > 0.$ We…
Bohring
  • 549
0
votes
0 answers

how to solve Lorentz equation with $\sigma$ = o

Is it possible to solve the Lorentz equation below analytically with $\sigma$ =0 : $\dot x = \sigma(x-y)$; $\dot y = \rho x-y -xz$; $\dot z = xy - \alpha z$ If so, would it be appropriate to use the dissipative property?
rade
  • 39
0
votes
1 answer

Why does a bifurcation require the eigenvalue of jacobian matrix to be zero

Consider equilibrium solutions of $f(x; \mu) = 0$ where $f :\Bbb{R}\times\Bbb{R}\to\Bbb{R}$ is a smooth function. Suppose that $x_0$ is an equilibrium solution at $\mu_0$, meaning that $f(x_0; µ_0) = 0$. If $$f:\Bbb{R}×\Bbb{R}\to\Bbb{R}$$ is a…
0
votes
0 answers

Linear Anosov map with the set of points of the torus of rational coordinates

Given the linear Anosov map $F_L$ of $\mathbb{T}^2$: $$z\mapsto \begin{bmatrix} 2 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix} z \quad\text{mod }1$$ it's already proved that there exists $P\in\mathbb N$ such that $F_L^P|_{M_N}=Id$, where $M_N$…
0
votes
1 answer

What's the impulse response of this first order system?

I think my textbook may be wrong, I really can't get this. I'll ask to my teacher, but in the meanwhile I'd like to discuss this with you. A first order system: $$ y(k+1) = a(k)y(k) + g(k) $$ Given $y(k_0)$ and a sequence $g(k)$ defined from $k\ge…
user34295
  • 735
0
votes
0 answers

Determine input/state/output representation for a discrete - time system

Does anyone know how we can determine input/state/output representation for a discrete - time system? For example we have the discrete-time system y(t) = u(t)u(t-1)u(t-2) how can we determine an i/s/o representation for it?
0
votes
2 answers

Is _the_ wandering set _a_ wandering set?

Say we have a dynamical system $T : X \to X$ ($T$ continuous injective on $X$ topological). The wandering set is the set of wandering points. We say $x$ is wandering if there exits an open neighborhood $U$ of $x$ and a time $n \in \mathbb{N}^*$ such…
Cryme
  • 514
0
votes
1 answer

Center manifold of dynamical system

Studying this dynamical system $\begin{cases}\dot x =(a-1)xy\\\dot y=-y^2\end{cases}$ ; I found that points along $y=0$ are equilibrium points, and linearization is $J=\begin{pmatrix}0& (a-1)x\\0& 0\end{pmatrix}$. So i have to look at the center…
Mattew
  • 13
0
votes
0 answers

period-2 orbit for a discrete time dynamical system

I have the following map defined on the unit square $0\leq x,y \leq 1$: $$B(x,y)=\begin{cases}(2x,y/3) & 0\leq x< 1/2\\ \\(2x-1,(2+y)/3)& 1/2\leq x < 1 \end{cases}$$ How do I find two points in this unit square which form a period-2 orbit of $B$?
FlyGuy
  • 11
0
votes
0 answers

Linearized equation of motion

Suppose a bead mass $m$ that is free to slide in on a wire that is rotating about the $z$ axis through origin $O$ with angular velocity $\omega$ and the wire is made into a parabolic shape such that $z=r^2/2a$ where $z$ is the vertically upward from…
0
votes
1 answer

Transformation maps between different Poincare sections

Let us have a dynamical system $(M, f)$ and some Poincare section, $P_1,..,P_n$. As far as I can understand, similar to what we are doing when we have only a single Poincare section, we can define maps $$f_{ij}(x_k) = x_{k+1}$$ that maps the point…
Our
  • 7,285
0
votes
0 answers

What are the prerequisites of Dynamical systems?

I'm really interested in learning dynamical systems (to be more specific, I want to understand things like Lorentz Attractors, the Mandelbrot set, the logistic map and fractal geometry) I have no acquaintance with advanced mathematics (recently…
0
votes
1 answer

Is there a mirror pair shape that can contain a light ray bundle indefinitely?

Suppose you have a bundle of light rays with origin around a point $x_0 \pm \epsilon_x$ and direction of about $v_0 \pm \epsilon_v$ .Is there a pair of mirrors separated by a gap like in the image such that the bundle could be trapped bouncing back…
good_one
  • 141
0
votes
0 answers

proof of the following version of Poincaré recurrence

Does anyone know where I find the proof of the following version of Poincaré recurrence: Let $(X, \mathcal{B}, \mu, T)$ be a measure-preserving system with $\mu(X)=1$ only assumed to be a finitely additive measure ($\mu(∅) = 0$ and $\mu(A ∪ B) =…
Ilovemath
  • 2,921
0
votes
0 answers

Why is it sufficient to check at one point on the orbit to determine the hyperbolicity?

In this Wikipedia entry on hyperbolic sets of dynamical systems, on the examples section, it was asserted that "more generally, a periodic orbit of $f$ with period $n$ is hyperbolic if and only if $Df^n$ at any point of the orbit has no eigenvalue…
MyCindy2012
  • 709
  • 3
  • 11