Questions tagged [equivalence-relations]

For questions about relations that are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. These are relations that model a sense of "equality" between elements of a set. Consider also using the (relation) tag.

An equivalence relation is a particular kind of relation that models a notion of "equality" between elements of a set. A relation $R$ on a set $X$ will be an equivalence relation if it satisfies the following properties:

  • Reflexive – For each $a \in X$, we have $a \mathrel{R} a$.
  • Symmetric – For any $a,b \in X$, $a \mathrel{R} b$ if and only if $b \mathrel{R} a$
  • Transitive – For any $a,b,c \in X$, if $a \mathrel{R} b$ and $b \mathrel{R} c$, then $a \mathrel{R} c$.

Commonly the symbols $\equiv$ or $\cong$ or $\simeq$ or $=$ are used for equivalence relations instead of the letter $R$. Here are some examples of equivalence relations:

  • On the set $\mathbf{Z}$ of integers define the relation $\equiv_{37}$ on $\mathbf{Z}\times \mathbf{Z}$ by saying $a\equiv_{37} b$ if both $a$ and $b$ give the same remainder when divided by $37$. If $a \equiv_{37} b$ we say that $a$ and $b$ are congruent modulo $37$.

  • Let $T$ be the set of all triangles in the plane. An example of an equivalence relation on $T$ is the relation of two triangles being congruent.

3120 questions
0
votes
1 answer

For $\ a, b \in \mathbb Z, a\approx b\ \Leftrightarrow \ 2a+3b\equiv0\pmod5$ Is $\sim$ an equivalence relation on $\mathbb Z$?

Let $\sim$ and $\approx$ be relations on $\mathbb Z$ defined as follows: $$\text{For } a, b \in \mathbb Z, a\sim b\text{ if and only if } 2a+3b\equiv0\pmod5$$ $$\text{For } a, b \in \mathbb Z, a\approx b \text{ if and only if }…
Claire
  • 167
0
votes
1 answer

Is this smallest equivalent relation right?

Lets say $R={(1,3),(2,2),(1,4)}⊆\underline{4}×\underline{4}$ is a relation to $\underline{4}$. I'm looking for the smallest equivalent relation to $\underline{4}$. My idea was the following: It has to be reflexive, so we need $(1,1),(3,3),(4,4)$ It…
0
votes
1 answer

Double Conditional Equivalence Relation

For all $a \in\mathbb{Z}$, $a \sim a + 3$; For all $a \in\mathbb{Z}$, $a \sim a + 7$; Show that $a ∼ b$ for all $a,b \in\mathbb{Z}$. I found the equivalence above online yet I don't comprehend how this relation is equivalent for $a\sim b$. Thank…
0
votes
0 answers

Equivalence Relations : on sets (case of identical pairs)

I have a similar question that is posted here: finding different equivalence relations But I don't understand the answers that people gave there. I have seen some where that when you have the set S = {x,y,z} that the equivalence relation could…
Palu
  • 841
0
votes
1 answer

Equivalence relation intersected with a set

I have a question about Equivalence relation. There is a set A, and for this set I have a Equivalence relation C. Then there is a subset B ⊂ A My question is about this expression I don't understand: C ∩ (B x B ) How can be the Relation C…
Pedro
  • 379
0
votes
2 answers

Prove that $\neg p \to (q \to r)$ and $q \to (p \vee r)$ are logically equivalent using the laws of logical equivalences

Please help, I cannot figure out how $\neg p \to (q \to r)$ and $q \to (p \vee r)$ are logically equivalent using the laws of logical equivalences. Here's what I came up, please help to explain how to show that the equation is logically…
Nuvali
  • 11
  • 1
  • 1
  • 2
0
votes
1 answer

show that the projection $f: X\rightarrow X$ is an equivalence relation

Let X be a set and let $f: X\rightarrow X$ be a projection. We define a relation on X such that $x \sim y$, means that there exist a natural numbers m and n such that $f^m(x)=f^n(y)$ ($f^m$ means $f \circ f\circ ... \circ f$ $m$ times) I´m suppose…
Abc123
  • 37
0
votes
1 answer

finding equivalence class of a set $U$

Let $R$ be an equivalence relation on a non empty set $X=[0, 1].$ $x R y$ iff $x=y$ or $x, y \in \{0, 1\}$. Define $R[A]=\{y \in X: x R y ,\text{for some $x \in A$} \}$ Then what is $R(U)?$, where $U=(0, 1/2]$ my ans is $R(U)=U$ but the given…
1256
  • 791
0
votes
0 answers

Equivalence relation on pairs of integers by their gcd

On $\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}$ define the relation $R$, where $((a,b),(c,d)) \in R$ if and only if $\gcd(a,b)=\gcd(c,d)$. Show that $R$ is a equivalence relation. Reflexivity : For every $(a,b) \in \mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}$ we have…
Adel
  • 1
0
votes
2 answers

Equivalence Relation IFF (a+b)\2

Let R be a relation on $Z$ defined as follows: for $a, b ∈ Z, a R b$ if and only if $2$ divides $a + b.$ Is R an equivalence relation? Prove your answer. New to thinking about this. Not sure about the IFF part. Is the relation than…
0
votes
1 answer

Homotopy is an equivalence relation on the set of all loops on X.

How can I prove "Homotopy is an equivalence relation on the set of all loops on $X$." using the definition of homotopy $rel$ for loops: Let $f, g$ be two loops in $X$ based at $x$, i.e. $f(0) = f(1) = x = g(0) = g(1)$. We say that $f$ is homotopic…
Rabab
  • 13
0
votes
0 answers

Equivalence relation on not equal sets

Can we define an equivalence relation $R$ which is a subset of $A×B$ on $A$ and $B$, if $A$ is not equal to $B$? My guess is no. Because $(x,x)$ will not be in $R$ where $x$ is an element of $A$ (i.e. not reflexive). Or are equivalence relations…
0
votes
0 answers

Is this an equivalence relation and explaination?

The question is: Let $A = \{\text{cat, dog, mouse, bird}\}$ and let $R$ be the binary relation on $A$ given by $R = \{(x,y) \mid \text{$x$ and $y$ have no letter in common}\}$. (a) Draw $R$. (b) State whether or not $R$ is an equivalence…
Shannon
  • 111
0
votes
1 answer

The intervals of real numbers (−∞;0[ , [0;+∞) constitute equivalence classes on ℝ. True or false?

There is no further information given. My thoughts on this question are if there can be equivalence classes if there is no equivalence relation? Thank you in advance !
0
votes
1 answer

Properties of equivalence relation

(a) Property $2$ of an equivalence relation states that if $a\sim b$ then $b\sim a$. property $3$ states that if $a\sim b$ and $b\sim c$ then $a\sim c$. What is wrong with the following proof that properties $2$ and $3$ imply property $1$? Let…
RFZ
  • 16,814