Questions tagged [logic]

Questions about mathematical logic, including model theory, proof theory, computability theory (a.k.a. recursion theory), and non-standard logics. Questions which merely seek to apply logical or formal reasoning to other areas of mathematics should not use this tag. Consider using one of the following tags as well, if they fit the question: (model-theory), (set-theory), (computability), and (proof-theory). This tag is not for logical puzzles, use (puzzle).

This tag broadly covers the field of mathematical logic, which deals with questions involving formalized mathematical statements, mathematical structures, and their relationships. The development of mathematical logic in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was intertwined with the interest in foundations of mathematics (), although much current work in logic is not directly related to foundations.

The elementary content of mathematical logic involves formal mathematical languages, quantifiers, and formal proofs of statements. These formal proofs are carried out in formal proof systems (see ), which model ordinary mathematical reasoning but, unlike natural language proofs, have a fully specified syntax and grammar that could in principle be verified mechanically. Specific tags for these topics include and . The full development of these ideas happens in the field of . A well known application of proof-theoretic methods is Gödel's incompleteness theorem .

The field of studies models of formal languages. Examples include algebraic structures such as groups and rings, as well as more esoteric structures. The field focuses on definability within such structures, relative to particular formal languages.

The field of studies formalized notations of computability, such as Turing computability and hyperarithmetical computability, as well as their applications to mathematics.

The field of studies sets by considering formal axiomatic systems of set theory such as ZFC. Questions about basic topics that might be found in "Chapter 0" of an undergraduate textbook (such as unions, intersections, subsets, etc.) are classified on this site as , while the includes questions about models of ZFC, large cardinals, the method of forcing, etc. Some researchers view set theory as part of mathematical logic, while others view it as a distinct area; the logic tag is not mandatory for set theory questions.

There are other areas which overlap with mathematical logic, but are not always considered part of it. The field of has many similarities to logic, and has important foundational aspects.

The foundational aspects of logic include mathematical constructivism, which is classified here as .


This tag does not include questions about ordinary logical reasoning in mathematical proof writing. Questions that ask about the logical structure or logical methods of ordinary mathematical proofs should be labeled with the tag unless they ask about specific formal proof systems.

This tag should not be used for what a layperson might called "a logical puzzle". For these sort of questions please use and as appropriate. (Unless the solution is done via a method relevant to the logic tag, of course.)

27971 questions
2
votes
2 answers

Why is this proposition provable and its converse not?

I found this proposition and don't see exactly as to why it is true and even more so, why the converse is false: Proposition 1. The equivalence between the proposition $z \in D$ and the proposition $(\exists x \in D)x = z$ is provable from the…
Relative0
  • 1,419
2
votes
0 answers

Writing an implication in the form "if, then"

I need to write the following sentence in the form "if, then": "The only possibility for the integer n - 3 to be even is for n to be odd" The textbook in which I found this question gives the solution as: "If n is an odd integer, then n − 3 is…
raphiki
  • 21
2
votes
1 answer

Simplify$ [(ABC)' + (B' + C)']'$

Need help on how to simplify $[(ABC)' + (B' + C)']'$. Here is my attempt: \begin{eqnarray} &&[(ABC)' + (B' + C)']'\\ &=&(ABC) + (B' + C)\\ &=&B'+C(AB + 1)\\ &=&B' + ABC \end{eqnarray} Is this correct? What can I do next?
2
votes
1 answer

Cut-Free FOL Proof

I have a sequent that I’ve been puzzling over and was wondering if anyone can help me out. I’m trying to prove ⊢∃x∀y(Fx->Fy). I’ve already been able to prove it using the Cut Rule, but I can’t seem to prove it without. I used (Fx v ~Fx)⊢∃x∀y(Fx->Fy)…
PW_246
  • 1,256
2
votes
2 answers

Show the equivalence using the usual laws $r \land ( \neg p \rightarrow F) \equiv r \rightarrow p$

NOTE: The $F$ represents false. I have this question in my hw, the thing is that I think that equivalence is not true. Because $r \land ( \neg p \rightarrow F) \equiv r \land ( p \lor F) \equiv r \land p$ And by doing the truth table of $r \land p$…
Math_D
  • 327
2
votes
1 answer

A subtlety with $\vDash$?

The symbol $\vDash$ seems to have two different meanings: to show logical consequence and to show truth in a model. These seem to be two different things referred to by the same symbol as the following shows. As a symbol of logical consequence the…
user774814
2
votes
1 answer

Is this the right solution?

please state whether this is true/false: Let p = true, q = false, r = true $\neg r \implies (p \wedge \neg q) = true$ [correct?] false $\implies$ true that will be true right?
MethodManX
  • 1,127
2
votes
1 answer

Well-Ordering and Induction on the Natural Numbers

I apologize in advance if this question seems overly pedantic. On a high level, I am confused about the relationships between the principle of recursive definition, induction, and well-ordering on the natural numbers. First, suppose that we…
2
votes
1 answer

Puzzle: Rotors intro to logic Stanford Course

I need help with this puzzle, I tried to solve it but could find what's wrong with my solution, forgive me if I have any silly mistakes. it has been quite some time since I have done any mathematics. The Puzzle: A natural number n is a rotor if and…
A. S.
  • 107
2
votes
3 answers

Understanding non-truths and writing them as contradictions

A contradiction is defined as a logical proposition that is always false, such as $(p \land \neg p) \iff False $ According to my Professor, examples of non-truth are (1) Assuming that $(p\rightarrow q)$ and $(\neg p \rightarrow \neg q )$ are…
Heng Wei
  • 419
2
votes
1 answer

Logical Argumentation of $[(\phi \lor \psi) \implies \theta] \iff [(\phi \implies \theta) \wedge (\psi \implies \theta)]$

I'm trying to practice arguing logical equivalence. I know how to do this via truth tables, or by some applications of contrapositives, but I'd like to get a handle on logical argumentation. My biggest question is: is my argument is valid? Aside…
recur
  • 23
2
votes
1 answer

Is a propositional variable a proposition?

I understand a proposition is an assertion that is true or false (not both) and propositional variable is used to stand for an arbitrary and unspecified proposition. A propositional variable is analogous to using "$x$" in place of a number in…
Golden_Ratio
  • 12,591
2
votes
2 answers

FST and SND operations in language of elementary arithmetic.

I'm trying to figure out this problem, without any luck now. Maybe you can help me. Suppose we have a first order logic with functions and predicates. We pick a signature, that consists of operation symbols: S^1, +^2, *^2 and a predicate symbol…
2
votes
1 answer

Does the operand of logical negation have a name?

Conjunction has "conjunct". Disjunction has "disjunct". Implication has "antecedent" and "consequent". Does the operand of negation have a name?
2
votes
2 answers

Does the statement, "every number other than zero has a multiplicative inverse" require two variables?

Can the English sentence, "every number other than zero has a multiplicative inverse" be written as $∀x(x \ne 0 → x \cdot 1/x = 1)$
Kheaven
  • 21