Questions tagged [equivalence-relations]

For questions about relations that are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. These are relations that model a sense of "equality" between elements of a set. Consider also using the (relation) tag.

An equivalence relation is a particular kind of relation that models a notion of "equality" between elements of a set. A relation $R$ on a set $X$ will be an equivalence relation if it satisfies the following properties:

  • Reflexive – For each $a \in X$, we have $a \mathrel{R} a$.
  • Symmetric – For any $a,b \in X$, $a \mathrel{R} b$ if and only if $b \mathrel{R} a$
  • Transitive – For any $a,b,c \in X$, if $a \mathrel{R} b$ and $b \mathrel{R} c$, then $a \mathrel{R} c$.

Commonly the symbols $\equiv$ or $\cong$ or $\simeq$ or $=$ are used for equivalence relations instead of the letter $R$. Here are some examples of equivalence relations:

  • On the set $\mathbf{Z}$ of integers define the relation $\equiv_{37}$ on $\mathbf{Z}\times \mathbf{Z}$ by saying $a\equiv_{37} b$ if both $a$ and $b$ give the same remainder when divided by $37$. If $a \equiv_{37} b$ we say that $a$ and $b$ are congruent modulo $37$.

  • Let $T$ be the set of all triangles in the plane. An example of an equivalence relation on $T$ is the relation of two triangles being congruent.

3120 questions
1
vote
1 answer

Proof of a equivalence relation

A set $A$ is equipotent to a set $B$ $(A\sim B)$, if a bijection $f: A \rightarrow B$ exists. How to prove, that $\sim$ is a equivalence relation? EDIT: I understand the concept of reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity. I just don't know how to…
Arthur
  • 1,557
1
vote
1 answer

Equivalence relation - Equilavence classes explanation

I have the following equivalence relation problem. $Let \ R\subseteq 2^S*2^S = \{(A,B):|A\cap T|=|B \cap T|\}\ where\ S=\{0,1,2\} \ and \ T=\{1,2\} \ Show \ that \ R \ is \ a \ equivalence \ relation \ to \ 2^S \ and \ describe \ the \…
Wanderer
  • 927
1
vote
1 answer

Is it possible for a relation to be transitive and symmetric but not reflexive with only one element?

E.g. On the set $A = \{1,2,3,4,5,6\}$, is the relation set $R = \{(1,1)\}$ a transitive and symmetric relation but not reflexive?
1
vote
3 answers

Prove a relation using an equivalence relation

Prove the relation define on $\mathbb{R} \!\,^2$ by $$(x_1,y_1) \sim(x_2,y_2) \Leftrightarrow x_1^2+y_1^2=x_2^2+y_2^2$$ is an equivalence relation Ok, so I know what an equivalence relation is. It must be: reflexive symmetric transitive But I don't…
Math Major
  • 2,234
1
vote
1 answer

Finding the relation between on set of natural numbers?

Each case below gives a relation on the set of all nonempty subsets of the natural numbers. Determine whether the relation is transitive,symmetric, or reflexive. Case 1: $R$ is defined by $ARB$ if and only if $A\cap B \neq \emptyset$ : This seems…
Fernando Martinez
  • 6,698
  • 19
  • 74
  • 108
1
vote
1 answer

Proving projection map is onto

Let $X$ be a nonempty set and let $R$ be an equivalence relation on $X.$ Given $X/R={[a]:a \in X}$. Prove that there is a map called the projection where $p_x:X\to X/R$ given by $p_x(t)=[t].$ Then this map is onto (surjective). I know that by…
mason
  • 19
1
vote
1 answer

How to show that the following relation is not an equivalence relation?

We have the relation $\sim$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$: $x\sim y \leftrightarrow d(x,y)\in \mathbb{Q}$, where $d(x,y)=\sqrt{\sum^n_{i=1}(x_i-y_i)^2}$. How do you prove that this isn't an equivalence relation for $n>1$? I know for sure that it's reflexive, so…
1
vote
0 answers

Describe an equivalence class

On the set N x N, define the following relation: (a, b) ~ (c, d) if and only if a + d = b + c (a). Show that this is an equivalence relation I have shown that this is an equivalence relation by proving that the relation has a reflexive, symmetric,…
amundi12
  • 509
1
vote
1 answer

What is wrong with the following argument?

Say we have a set $X$ and an equivalence relation $C$ on $X$. Why do we need reflexivity? Let $x,y \in X$ with $xCy $. By symmetry we obtain $yCx$. Applying now transitivity, we have $xCx$. So, we have reflexivity from symmetry and transitivity.
ILoveMath
  • 10,694
1
vote
1 answer

implications, equivalence, disjunction

I might not be very clear with this but i hope someone gets it Prove that $f : X→Y$ is surjective then and only then when $g_1, g_2$ which $Y → Z$ we have $g_1 \circ f= g_2 \circ f \Rightarrow g_1 = g_2$ it would be very helpful for me if someone…
0
votes
3 answers

Given $n \sim r \iff n \equiv r \pmod d$, prove $\sim$ is an equivalence relation.

It is given that n belongs to Z and d belongs to N. How do I prove that n=r mod d defines equivalence relation? I know I have to prove it is reflexive, symmetric and transitive. But how do I do that?
277roshan
  • 111
0
votes
2 answers

Does R^2 has the same property as R?

If R is a relation on set A, define $R^2$ by $aR^2b$ if and only if there exists c with aRc and cRb. If R is reflexive/symmetric/transitive does $R^2$ have the same property ? I'm not sure how to do this question? Any help is appreciated!
0
votes
1 answer

Possible Equivalence Relation Question

Consider $\langle\Bbb{Z}_6, +_6\rangle$. Let $a\sim b$ if and only if $\{a,b\}$ generates $\langle\Bbb{Z}_6, +_6\rangle$. $a,b \in \Bbb{Z}_6$. Is $\sim$ an equivalence relation? I know an equivalence relation must have the properties of being…
0
votes
2 answers

Equivalence Class Question

On the set $N\times N$ define $(m,n)\simeq(k,l)$ if $m+l=n+k$. Draw a sketch of $N\times N$ that shows several equivalence classes. (hint: sketch points on graph paper). I'm not quite sure how to sketch the equivalence classes. I know that the…
0
votes
2 answers

Equivalence relations for $\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}$ defined as $(m, n) \sim (k, l)$ if $m+l=n+k$

On the set $\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}$ define $(m, n) \sim (k, l)$ if $m + l = n + k$. Show that $\sim$ is an equivalence relation on $\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}$. Draw a sketch of $\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}$ that shows several equivalence…