Questions tagged [equivalence-relations]

For questions about relations that are reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. These are relations that model a sense of "equality" between elements of a set. Consider also using the (relation) tag.

An equivalence relation is a particular kind of relation that models a notion of "equality" between elements of a set. A relation $R$ on a set $X$ will be an equivalence relation if it satisfies the following properties:

  • Reflexive – For each $a \in X$, we have $a \mathrel{R} a$.
  • Symmetric – For any $a,b \in X$, $a \mathrel{R} b$ if and only if $b \mathrel{R} a$
  • Transitive – For any $a,b,c \in X$, if $a \mathrel{R} b$ and $b \mathrel{R} c$, then $a \mathrel{R} c$.

Commonly the symbols $\equiv$ or $\cong$ or $\simeq$ or $=$ are used for equivalence relations instead of the letter $R$. Here are some examples of equivalence relations:

  • On the set $\mathbf{Z}$ of integers define the relation $\equiv_{37}$ on $\mathbf{Z}\times \mathbf{Z}$ by saying $a\equiv_{37} b$ if both $a$ and $b$ give the same remainder when divided by $37$. If $a \equiv_{37} b$ we say that $a$ and $b$ are congruent modulo $37$.

  • Let $T$ be the set of all triangles in the plane. An example of an equivalence relation on $T$ is the relation of two triangles being congruent.

3120 questions
1
vote
1 answer

Relations on $\mathbb{N}$

I'm having a tough time with understanding binary relations and need some help on the following task. Let $\sim$ be a relation on $\mathbb{N}$ defined by $x\sim y$ if $x + y\in\{2n:n\in\mathbb{N}\}$. What properties does $\sim$ have? My work so…
Thomas
  • 781
1
vote
1 answer

Fewest number of possible ordered pairs in a relation

There are many different equivalence relation possible on the set $A = \{a, b, c, d\}.$ For example, here are just two different ones: (a) $E_1 = \{(a, a), (b, b), (c, c), (d, d), (a, c), (c, a), (b, d), (d, b)\}.$ (b) $E_2 = \{(a, a), (b, b), (c,…
1
vote
1 answer

How to prove two equivalence classes are disjoint?

I know how to prove when the two equivalence classes are not disjoint, i.e. $[a]=[b]$. I see that the proof works for proving a equivalence class is disjoint, but I don't get it. Can someone explain it to me?
1
vote
1 answer

Counting ordered pairs in quotient set

We have equivalence relation E on the set $$A = \{1,2,3,4,5\}$$ So the quotient set: $$A/E = \{\{1,2,3\}, \{4\}, \{5\}\}.$$ How much orderd pairs we can find in E? How to count the ordered pairs? Thank you!
BAM
  • 433
  • 1
  • 7
  • 17
1
vote
5 answers

Show that $x$ is an element of its own equivalence class?

If $R$ is an equivalence relation on $X$ and $x$ is an element of $X$, the equivalence class is defined as $[x]_R = [y ∈ X : xRy]$. Since $x$ is equivalent to itself, doesn't that automatically make it in its own equivalence class? It seems pretty…
Chris
  • 1,129
  • 1
  • 9
  • 18
1
vote
3 answers

Equivalence Relations and Classes 3

I am studying for a discrete math exam that is tomorrow and the questions on equivalence classes are not making sense to me. Practice Problem: Let $\sim$ be the relation defined on set of pairs $(x, y) \in R^2$ such that $(x, y) \sim (p, q)$ if and…
Gonez
  • 31
1
vote
1 answer

How to prove equivalence relations

I'm going through Pinter's "A Book of Abstract Algebra" and I'm currently on the topic of Partitions and Equivalence Relations. I'm having a little trouble understanding the way he (and apparently many other authors) word their questions. For…
hijasonno
  • 171
  • 8
1
vote
2 answers

Describe equivalence classes from equivalence relations

I don't really understand the way to do these. Describe equivalence classes for the following equivalence relations on the given set $S$: (i) $S$ is the set of all points in the plane, and $a\sim b$ means $a$ and $b$ have the same distance from the…
1
vote
1 answer

What is wrong with the following "proof" that $\sim$ is reflexive?

Let ~ be a symmetric and transitive relation on a set A. What is wrong with the folloing "proof" that $\sim$ is reflexive? Proof: $a\sim b$ implies $b\sim a$ by symmetry; then $a\sim b$ and $b\sim a$ imply that $a\sim a$ by transitivity, thus…
Leon K
  • 79
1
vote
3 answers

Why is this binary relation symmetric but not reflexive or transitive

Let $\def\Rthree{\,{\mathrm{R}_3}\,} \Rthree$ be the relation on sets $C$, $D$ of natural numbers such that $C \Rthree D$ iff $C \cap D$ is finite. Then $\Rthree$ is symmetric, but not reflexive or transitive. I don't understand any of the 3. The…
wcarvalho
  • 163
1
vote
1 answer

Transitive Relations Problem,

Let S be the set of all three-digit numbers, and define x~y to mean that x and y have the same first and last digit. (i) Show that the relations ~ is transitive. (ii) List two numbers in the equivalence class [737] and two numbers not in this…
1
vote
1 answer

How to determine an equivalence class?

Let $A$ be a nonempty set and let $B$ be a fixed subset of $A$. A relations $R$ is defined on the power set $\mathcal{P}(A)$ by $X\mathrel{R}Y$ if $X \cap B = Y \cap B$. Let $A=\{1,2,3,4,5\}$ and $B=\{1,3\}$. For a subset $X=\{2,3,4\}$, Determine…
Mathgirl
  • 527
1
vote
2 answers

Relations and Equivalence - numbers are related if they have the same floor

$S$ is defined on $\mathbb{Q}$ by $xSy$ if and only if $⌊x⌋=⌊y⌋$ (Note that$⌊q⌋$is defined to be the largest integer less than or equal to q. You can think of it as “$q$ rounded down”.) We've been asked to find the relations of this. So far I have…
JennyJ
  • 11
1
vote
2 answers

Equivalence relation on a set of integers

I was wondering if the relation $X$ would be an equivalence relation only if the result is an even number. For example the relation $X$ is given by $a\ X\ b$ only if $a+b$ is even. Would this be considered an equivalence relation making is…
Yaz
  • 15
1
vote
3 answers

Equivalence Relation with dividing x and y integers

Define $x\sim y$ means 5 divides $(x - y)$ for $x$ and $y$ integers. Show that is an equivalence relation. Equivalence relation means it satisfies reflexity, symmetry, and transitivity. reflexive: $x\sim x$ means 5 divides $x$ symmetry: $x \sim y…
Wolfy
  • 6,495