Questions tagged [induction]

For questions about mathematical induction, a method of mathematical proof. Mathematical induction generally proceeds by proving a statement for some integer, called the base case, and then proving that if it holds for one integer then it holds for the next integer. This tag is primarily meant for questions about induction over natural numbers but is also appropriate for other kinds of induction such as transfinite, structural, double, backwards, etc.

Mathematical induction is a form of deductive reasoning. Its most common use is induction over well-ordered sets, such as natural numbers or ordinals. While induction can be expanded to class relations which are well-founded, this tag is aimed mostly at questions about induction over natural numbers.

In general use, induction means inference from the particular to the general. This is used in terms such as inductive reasoning, which involves making an inference about the unknown based on some known sample. Mathematical induction is not true induction in this sense, but is rather a form of proof.

Induction over the natural numbers generally proceeds with a base case and an inductive step:

  • First prove the statement for the base case, which is usually $n=0$ or $n=1$.
  • Next, assume that the statement is true for an input $n$, and prove that it is true for the input $n+1$.

The following variant goes without a base case: Assuming the statement is true for all $n\in\mathbb N$ with $n < N$, prove that is true for $N$, too. This has to be done for all $N\in\mathbb N$.

10150 questions
1
vote
3 answers

What numbers can be written as a sum of two or more consecutive odd numbers?

I'm having trouble setting up a case and proving through induction or whether there is a better way to prove this.
user61646
  • 403
1
vote
0 answers

How to prove the following claim using structural induction?

The number of propositional variables is always at most one more than the number of connectives for every formula φ ∈ PROP. where PROP is the set which represents all valid formula in propositional logic I tried doing this proof in various ways,…
1
vote
4 answers

Help with induction proof

I need help with the following induction proof which I am not sure if I am doing correctly. $$\frac{1}{1\cdot3}+\frac{1}{3\cdot5}+...+\frac{1}{(2n-1)(2n+1)}=\frac{n}{2n+1}$$ I check for $n=1$ (Base…
1
vote
2 answers

Proof by mathematical induction help

Prove that for all non-negative integers $n$, $$\sum_{r=0}^n r\binom{n}{r}=n2^{n-1}$$ My attempt and reasoning went as follows: $$n2^{n-1}=\frac{1}{2}n2^n=\frac{1}{2}n(1+1)^n$$ By the binomial theorem where $a=1$ and…
1
vote
3 answers

Help with this proof by induction with inequalities.

Show that mathematical induction can be used to prove the stronger inequality $\frac{1}{2}\cdot ...\cdot \frac{2n-1}{2n} < \frac{1}{\sqrt{3n + 1}}$ for all integers greater than 1, which, together with a verification for the case where n = 1,…
banana
  • 225
1
vote
2 answers

Given a finite collection of numbers, the products obtained by multiplying them in any order are all equal.

How do I prove the following by induction? Given a finite collection of numbers, the sums/products obtained by adding/multiplying them in any order are all equal.
yh05
  • 363
1
vote
0 answers

Prove that for any odd number m, there is some $e \in \mathcal{E}$ such that $vr(e) + op(e) = m$

Prove that for any odd number m, there is some $e \in \mathcal{E}$ such that $vr(e) + op(e) = m$ vr means variable, op means operators like $+/-$ Attempt: I will prove this with structural induction Base Case: $3$ cases: $e = x, y, z$ let $e = x$,…
Tree Garen
  • 709
  • 5
  • 15
1
vote
0 answers

recurrence induction finding a c and d to make it work $f(n) = c4^n - d2^n$

Consider the following recurrence defining a function $f : \mathbb N \to \mathbb N$. $$ f(n) = \begin{cases} 5 & n = 0 \\ 4f(n-1) + 3 \cdot 2^{n-1} & n > 0 \end{cases} $$ Use induction to find positive constants $c, d \in \mathbb R$…
Tree Garen
  • 709
  • 5
  • 15
1
vote
2 answers

Can anyone help me with this induction proof?

I need to prove that: $$1+3+5+\cdots+(2n+1)=(n+1)^2$$ I first verify that it is true for $n=0$ and then I check for $n=k$ If it is true for $n=k$, it should be true for $n=k+1$ Therefore: $$1+3+5+\cdots+(2k+1)+(2(k+1)+1)=(k+1)^{2}+(2(k+1)+1)$$…
1
vote
1 answer

Prove that a number raised to a prime is equal to itself and a multiple of the prime?

How do I prove using induction that any number a that is greater than or equal to 1, raised to a power k(which is prime) will be equal to a + kq, where q is some integer?
1
vote
2 answers

Am I allowed to change induction hypothesis?

I am doing the exercise from my textbook teaching the induction and stuck for a long time about the induction hypothesis part. The question is the following: Let $n \in \mathbb N \backslash \{0\}$, use some form of induction to prove that for all…
Metaozis
  • 177
1
vote
1 answer

Prove using induction that the $(2^{i})^{th}$ partial sum is less than $i + 1$ for $i \ge 1$

I have been working on the following proof for the last two hours and can't seem to solve it. I've tried finding an "intermediate" condition and a few other things but I can't seem to wrap my head around this. I'd be grateful if someone could show…
1
vote
1 answer

I'm not sure how to conclude what the Inductive Hypothesis for this Strong/Complete Induction proof

I checked the base case and it worked, but I'm not really sure what the hypothesis should be? $$n = k, a_k < (\frac{5}{3})^k$$ If we want to prove $$k+1$$ then we have this as what we're trying to proof: $$P(k+1) = a_{k+1} < (\frac{5}{3})^{k+1}$$
Stuy
  • 1,149
1
vote
1 answer

Did I misuse the inductive hypothesis?

Note $\log$ is $\log_2$ in this problem. I am working on the proof of a lemma that my professor used in class. He said we could verify that it works if we want, but I think I used the inductive hypothesis in such a way that I cannot continue my…
Pareod
  • 351
1
vote
2 answers

Proof by induction that $f^{(n)}(x)=p_n(x)e^{x^2}$ where $f(x)=e^{x^2}$

Let $f(x)=e^{x^2}$. Show by induction that $f^{(n)}(x)=p_n(x)e^{x^2}$ where $p_n(x)$ is an $n$th degree polynomial. $f^{(n)}(x)$ is the $n$th derivative of $f(x)$. Tip: You do not need to find a formula for $p_n(x)$. Hopefully I don't need someone…