Questions tagged [induction]

For questions about mathematical induction, a method of mathematical proof. Mathematical induction generally proceeds by proving a statement for some integer, called the base case, and then proving that if it holds for one integer then it holds for the next integer. This tag is primarily meant for questions about induction over natural numbers but is also appropriate for other kinds of induction such as transfinite, structural, double, backwards, etc.

Mathematical induction is a form of deductive reasoning. Its most common use is induction over well-ordered sets, such as natural numbers or ordinals. While induction can be expanded to class relations which are well-founded, this tag is aimed mostly at questions about induction over natural numbers.

In general use, induction means inference from the particular to the general. This is used in terms such as inductive reasoning, which involves making an inference about the unknown based on some known sample. Mathematical induction is not true induction in this sense, but is rather a form of proof.

Induction over the natural numbers generally proceeds with a base case and an inductive step:

  • First prove the statement for the base case, which is usually $n=0$ or $n=1$.
  • Next, assume that the statement is true for an input $n$, and prove that it is true for the input $n+1$.

The following variant goes without a base case: Assuming the statement is true for all $n\in\mathbb N$ with $n < N$, prove that is true for $N$, too. This has to be done for all $N\in\mathbb N$.

10150 questions
1
vote
0 answers

Base Case in in Mathematical Induction

What is the consequence of not proving a base case in mathematical induction? For example: prove that 2 + 4 + · · · + 2n = (n + 2)(n − 1) for any integer n ≥ 2 if a student jumped right into the inductive step without proving the base case We assume…
ekeith
  • 169
1
vote
5 answers

How to prove "For every positive integer n, $1^{n}$ + $2^{n}$ + ... + $n^{n}$ < $(n+1)^{n}$." by using induction?

How can I prove the following theorem: For every positive integer $n$, $1^n + 2^n + ... + n^n \lt (n+1)^n$ by using induction? I have proved that "for every real number $x > 0$ and every non-negative integer $n$, $x^{n} + n \cdot x^{n-1} \le…
Matthew
  • 65
1
vote
1 answer

Proofs by Induction - Showing that a > b and b > c means a > c.

I have a general question regarding induction, with an example provided. I'd also like any critique in my proof. Suppose I'm trying to prove the following. Define a sequence of integers a0, a1, a2, ... as follows: $a_i$ = 2 if 0 $\le$ i $\le$…
1
vote
2 answers

Proving $n^2 \leq 2^n$ using simple induction

Question: For which values of n, $n^2 \leq 2^n$ holds? Prove it by simple induction. This is what I have done so far: We know that all natural numbers other than 3 works. So I will make the claim that $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, n \neq 3: n^2 \leq…
Mat
  • 131
1
vote
3 answers

Induction proof $\sum_{k=1}^{n} k^{2} = \frac{1}{6} n(n+1)(2n+1)$

I'm asked to prove $$\sum_{k=1}^{n} k^{2} = \frac{1}{6} n(n+1)(2n+1)$$ using proof by induction. Now, I know how to do induction proofs and I end up at this step, needing to prove that: $$\frac{1}{6} n(n+1)(2n+1) + (n+1)^2 = \frac{1}{6}…
1
vote
1 answer

Munkres's Strong induction principle vs. "traditional" mathematical induction

Question: In Munkres's Topology (2nd ed.), he gives a proof for the following: Theorem 4.2 (Strong induction principle). Let $A$ be a set of positive integers. Suppose that for each positive integer $n$, the statement $S_n\subset A$ implies the…
1
vote
1 answer

Finding the coeffecient of $x_{n+j}\cdot x_{n+k}$ in $\prod_{l=2}^n(1+\sum_{i=1}^{l-1}c_{il}x_{n+i})$

For a fixed integers $j$ and $k$ with $1\leq j
R_D
  • 7,312
1
vote
3 answers

How to prove using induction correctly

In our school, we learned that proving using induction has three steps: Prove it for the smallest number of $n$. (Usually, $n=1$) Think it is true for $n$. Prove it is true for $n+1$. But recently, when I was watching Olympiad video series,…
Taha Akbari
  • 3,559
1
vote
3 answers

How to prove inequality $3^{n}≤4n!$ for $n≥4$ with mathematical induction?

Prove inequality $3^{n}≤4n!$ for $n≥4$ with mathematical induction. Base step: $n=4$ $3^{4}≤4*4!$ $81≤96$, so statement is true. Inductive step: We need to prove that this $3^{n+1}≤4(n+1)!$ is true. To get left side we only need to multiply whole…
1
vote
1 answer

Formula to obtain sum of $ 1^k+2^k+3^k+\cdots+(n-1)^k+n^k$

How would one systematically obtain the formula for $$ 1^k+2^k+3^k+\cdots+(n-1)^k+n^k$$ for a fixed positive integer exponent k? I am aware of the formulas $$\sum_{i=0}^n i^2 = \frac{(n^2+n)(2n+1)}{6}\quad ,\quad\sum_{i=0}^n i =…
Ayan Shah
  • 491
1
vote
1 answer

Induction problem for $U_{n+1}(x) = 2x U_n(x) - U_{n-1}(x),$ what can be assumed?

I have this straightforward induction problem that perhaps I am over thinking at this time of the morning. Here it is: $U_1(x) = 1, \; U_2(x) = 2x, \; U_{n+1}(x) = 2x U_n(x) - U_{n-1}(x).$ Prove that $U_n(\cos{\theta}) =…
Merkh
  • 3,630
1
vote
3 answers

The proof of the base case in proof by induction must always be to verify the claim is true for the number 1.

The question asks me to state True or False. Answer: I prefer True. I'm I correct?
Surdz
  • 627
1
vote
2 answers

Showing that $\sum_{j=0}^n (j+1) =\frac{(n+1) (n+2)}{2}$ whenever $n$ is a nonnegative integer.

First of all this is a mathematical induction proof. I faced difficulties just with the step 1 when verifying that $P(1)$ is true. Where $n=1$, the L.H.S is $$\sum_{j=0}^n (j+1)=0+1=1$$ Here I faced trouble when trying to prove the right hand…
Surdz
  • 627
1
vote
0 answers

Simple proof of part of master theorem

This is part of a homework assignment I'm having trouble with and would be thankful for a little hint. Let $a>b>1,c>0 \in \mathbb{N}$ and $T: \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N}$ defined recursively by $T(1) \leq c, T(n) \leq aT(\frac{n}{b})+cn$ and it can be…
mafu
  • 537
1
vote
1 answer

Prove $|A_1\cup\dotsb\cup A_n|\leq|A_1|+|A_2|+\dotsb+|A_n|$ using Induction

I need help proving Prove $|A_1\cup\dotsb\cup A_n|\leq|A_1|+|A_2|+\dotsb+|A_n|$ (probably using induction. I have already proven that $|A_1\cup A_2|\leq|A_1|+|A_2|$ by $|A_1\cup A_2|= (|A_1|+|A_2|)-|A_1\cap A_2|$ & Def of union of sets …
Vayelin
  • 25